On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Evan Gates wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Levine <_...@thomaslevine.com> wrote:
>> Or I guess I could try zsh or bash
>
> bash completion is very powerful as you can write shell functions to
> generate the possible completions based on what is on the comm
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Levine <_...@thomaslevine.com> wrote:
> Or I guess I could try zsh or bash
bash completion is very powerful as you can write shell functions to
generate the possible completions based on what is on the command line
so far. That being said you may lose yo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:56:51PM +, Thomas Levine wrote:
> For my login shell, I want a sh-compatible shell with the ability to
> specify complex completions. As far as I can tell, ksh only supports
> completions by command and filename. I want to do things like this,
> in tcsh.
>
> comple
For my login shell, I want a sh-compatible shell with the ability to
specify complex completions. As far as I can tell, ksh only supports
completions by command and filename. I want to do things like this,
in tcsh.
complete {folder,refile,scan,show,next,prev} \
'C@+*@`folders -fast -recurse
