Re: [dev] Re: musl libc

2011-02-16 Thread pancake
I have packaged musl in slpm* and it xompiles pretty nicely. The code os clean and short and a static hello world takes 2.5KB. Which is great. I have been statically linking other programs with slpm and musl and i got some headaches like missing definitions in some include files an so on. But i

[dev] Re: musl libc

2011-02-16 Thread finkler
On 02/12/11 19:48, pmarin wrote: > Have anyone tried it? > http://www.etalabs.net/musl/ > > Looks promising!