2009/7/1 David E. Thiel :
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 05:11:39PM +0100, Jimmy Tang wrote:
>> just thinking about this a bit after reading twfb's initial comment on
>> cycling through things, perhaps...
>>
>> for monitor selection (this seems more natural for general usage and
>> seems like a good def
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 05:11:39PM +0100, Jimmy Tang wrote:
> just thinking about this a bit after reading twfb's initial comment on
> cycling through things, perhaps...
>
> for monitor selection (this seems more natural for general usage and
> seems like a good default)
> mod1-shift-j
> mod1-s
Jimmy Tang wrote:
Hi Anslem
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 04:18:31PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
2009/7/1 Jimmy Tang :
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:06:56PM +0100, twfb wrote:
On 17:27 Sat 20 Jun � � , Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Monitors are currently selected through pressing Mod
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:32:31PM +0100, Jimmy Tang wrote:
> mon->0 has some windows
> mon->1 has some windows but has focus for the monitor
> - after using meta-e to shift change over to mon->1
>
> I move my mouse over to mon->0 to a window, highlight it and start doing
> something, but w
Hi Anslem
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 04:18:31PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/7/1 Jimmy Tang :
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:06:56PM +0100, twfb wrote:
> >> On 17:27 Sat 20 Jun , Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> >> > Monitors are currently selected through pressing Mod1-w, Mod1-e (just
> >> > two i
2009/7/1 Jimmy Tang :
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:06:56PM +0100, twfb wrote:
>> On 17:27 Sat 20 Jun , Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> > Monitors are currently selected through pressing Mod1-w, Mod1-e (just
>> > two initial keybindings), and clients are assigned to the selected
>>
>> First let me say
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:06:56PM +0100, twfb wrote:
> On 17:27 Sat 20 Jun , Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > Monitors are currently selected through pressing Mod1-w, Mod1-e (just
> > two initial keybindings), and clients are assigned to the selected
>
> First let me say that it's great to dwm worki
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 05:27:48PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> An initial version of the new xinerama support is committed into hg,
> it's not finished/polished yet, but the basics are usable already.
> During the development I decided to have a bar per monitor, instead of
> just one bar. It's l
On 17:27 Sat 20 Jun , Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Monitors are currently selected through pressing Mod1-w, Mod1-e (just
> two initial keybindings), and clients are assigned to the selected
First let me say that it's great to dwm working on dual head. For a
laptop user thats excellent.
I have been
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 05:27:48PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> An initial version of the new xinerama support is committed into hg,
> it's not finished/polished yet, but the basics are usable already.
> During the development I decided to have a bar per monitor, instead of
> just one bar. It's l
Hiho,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:03:24PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> Didn't the Ion maintainer consider switching to Windows over how
> totally retarded XrandR and Xinerama are?
yes, but the Ion maintainer is so legendarily insufferable that he's
possibly even worse than you :) (just read his blog)
Bes
Didn't the Ion maintainer consider switching to Windows over how
totally retarded XrandR and Xinerama are?
Seems that X keeps getting worse and worse even when you thought that
would be technically impossible.
uriel
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/6/22 Alexander Kry
2009/6/22 Alexander Krylowsky
>
> On Sat, 2009-06-20 17:27:48 +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > An initial version of the new xinerama support is committed into hg,
> > it's not finished/polished yet, but the basics are usable already.
> > During the development I decided to have a bar per monitor,
On Sat, 2009-06-20 17:27:48 +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> An initial version of the new xinerama support is committed into hg,
> it's not finished/polished yet, but the basics are usable already.
> During the development I decided to have a bar per monitor, instead of
> just one bar. It's less con
I have dual monitors at work so I'm real excited to try this out on monday. My
current solution is a custom patched dwm. It works but isn't optimal
--Original Message--
From: Anselm R Garbe
To: dev mail list
ReplyTo: dev mail list
Subject: [dev] Re: dwm development continue
An initial version of the new xinerama support is committed into hg,
it's not finished/polished yet, but the basics are usable already.
During the development I decided to have a bar per monitor, instead of
just one bar. It's less confusing that way.
Monitors are currently selected through pressin
16 matches
Mail list logo
