söndagen den 18 november 2012 14.04.27 skrev Christian Neukirchen:
> There are probably more sabotage forks than users by now. :) I don't
> know which ones does the symlink-stuff, but I can also tell you about my
> ideas then.
The rofl0r one is the one I consider "upstream" and he releases disk
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:32 PM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> tinycore also links all files of mounted squashfs mounts into the
> /usr/local. That kind of hack is more simple than stuff like unionfs.
>
With replacements being written into /usr? I prefer the indirection
being behind a standard a
Strake writes:
> On 18/11/2012, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>> GNU Stow also.
>
> Oh, yeah, that's what we need: more perl.
I remember relink.sf.net which is written in Perl too, but the code
looks really simple and it probably can be written in pure shell as
well.
--
Christian Neukirchenht
tinycore also links all files of mounted squashfs mounts into the
/usr/local. That kind of hack is more simple than stuff like unionfs.
@Anselm I think all those changes will come with the official 6.1 release?
Good work though.
Take care.
Anselm R Garbe writes:
> On 18 November 2012 07:00, Jens Staal wrote:
>> lördagen den 17 november 2012 14.50.23 skrev Kurt H Maier:
>>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:20:03PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> > sta.li
>>> > --
>>> > To me archlinux was a good distro until a couple of years ago.
