On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:42:05PM -0200, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read in the suckless site and I'm interested about statically linked
> executables and replace glibc.
>
> My questions are:
>
> - Why clibc? Most of distros that don't use glibc, use musl.
This is outdated. It shoul
Hi,
I read in the suckless site and I'm interested about statically linked
executables and replace glibc.
My questions are:
- Why clibc? Most of distros that don't use glibc, use musl.
- Why mksh as shell?
--
Henrique Lengler
