On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:49:26PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> 2009/9/23 David Neu :
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> >> This is really odd and it must be related to some older config.h,
> >> patch, or something else.
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >> Anselm
> >
> >
On Sep 23, 2009 at 05:49 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/9/23 David Neu :
> > Perhaps the lines referenced above in config.mk should be commented
> > out by default, as the comment preceding them seems to imply.
>
> What do others think about this proposal? No Xinerama support by default?
I no
Funny, I was using three monitors years before Xinerama was even
invented, I wonder how was that possible?
Tuomov is right on this one, Xinerama sucks:
http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/2008/the_downfall_of_x/
uriel
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:49 PM, miles groman wrote:
> Xinerama ++
>
> /me hugs his 2
fetishists...
2009/9/23 miles groman :
> Xinerama ++
>
> /me hugs his 2 monitors
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Neu wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> Ah that explains a lot. You aren't using dwm-5.6.1, right? You are
>>> using dwm-5.6?
>>> The bug y
Xinerama ++
/me hugs his 2 monitors
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Neu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> Ah that explains a lot. You aren't using dwm-5.6.1, right? You are
>> using dwm-5.6?
>> The bug you were noticing was fixed in dwm-5.6.1. Not buildin
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Ah that explains a lot. You aren't using dwm-5.6.1, right? You are
> using dwm-5.6?
> The bug you were noticing was fixed in dwm-5.6.1. Not building with
> Xinerama support will do the trick on single head setups as well of
> course.
Hi Ans
> What do others think about this proposal? No Xinerama support by default?
IMHO xinerama support should be enabled by default, since those -dev
libs are usually installed. (Disclaimer: I'm using Xinerama ;)
Regards,
Mate
Hi David,
2009/9/23 David Neu :
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> This is really odd and it must be related to some older config.h,
>> patch, or something else.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Anselm
>
> Hi Anselm,
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> Everything seems to working now ...
>
> I
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> This is really odd and it must be related to some older config.h,
> patch, or something else.
>
> HTH,
> Anselm
Hi Anselm,
Thanks for the response.
Everything seems to working now ...
I reviewed config.mk and noticed the following sectio
2009/9/23 Uriel :
> This crap is what you get as result of the braindead config.h system.
The config.h system is less likely to fail than any system that relies
on config files that are parsed.
And it is not required to edit config.h. It's just to separate vanilla
dwm from where patches are applie
This crap is what you get as result of the braindead config.h system.
uriel
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> 2009/9/22 David Neu :
>> My apologies if this has been addressed on the list, but I just
>> upgraded from dwm 5.5 to dwm 5.6.1, and the following fea
Hi David,
2009/9/22 David Neu :
> My apologies if this has been addressed on the list, but I just
> upgraded from dwm 5.5 to dwm 5.6.1, and the following features using
> the default config.h don't seem to be working
Are you sure you use vanilla dwm-5.6.1?
The symptoms you see don't sound like y
All,
My apologies if this has been addressed on the list, but I just
upgraded from dwm 5.5 to dwm 5.6.1, and the following features using
the default config.h don't seem to be working:
- The title of the focused window is not showing up in the status bar
(getting a 0)
- The selected tags are ind
13 matches
Mail list logo
