Paul Onyschuk wrote:
> I'm not completely sure if it's in interest of this mailing list, but
> underlying philosophy isn't far away from that of suckless community.
> Hope I don't upset anyone too much by posting this, on the other hand
> maybe someone will find it useful.
>
> I won't describe in
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:38:36 -0400
Aaron Burrow wrote:
> What do you think of minix 3?
>
> > cd ~/code/minix
> > find . -name "*.c" -or -name "*.h" | xargs wc -l
> ...
> 342686 total
It would be comparing apples and oranges.
Excluding Verilog sources, whole Oberon system is under ten thousand
>> However, and that's where I see the big problem, this system doesn't
comply with the set of common POSIX-standards and thus would require
huge changes or even complete rewrites of basic software we use every
day.
What do you think of minix 3?
http://wiki.minix3.org/en/DevelopersGuide/PosixAndMi
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:18:45 +0100
FRIGN wrote:
> I honeslty never heard of Project Oberon and I now read into the topic
> a bit more to find out. What bugs me is the fact Oberon is an object
> oriented programming language.
> This concept has already been discussed a lot on this ML and even
> th
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:51:26 +0100
Paul Onyschuk wrote:
> I'm not completely sure if it's in interest of this mailing list, but
> underlying philosophy isn't far away from that of suckless community.
> Hope I don't upset anyone too much by posting this, on the other hand
> maybe someone will find
I'm not completely sure if it's in interest of this mailing list, but
underlying philosophy isn't far away from that of suckless community.
Hope I don't upset anyone too much by posting this, on the other hand
maybe someone will find it useful.
I won't describe in detail what Oberon is, since info
