On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
>> Wait a second, why are there no C# quotes?
>
> sed -e 's/java/c#/i' should do it
>
>
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
Is a good quote about C#
--
Gabriel Laskar
Good point.
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 05:12:44PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> > Wait a second, why are there no C# quotes?
>
> sed -e 's/java/c#/i' should do it
>
>
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
--
Jake Todd
// If it isn't broke, tweak it!
pgp7b
Maybe nobody cares about C#?
It hardly seems worth even making fun of, and as Kurt well points out
just going to http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/java and doing a
mental s/Java/C#/ should do just fine if you really want quotes about
C#
uriel
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> W
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Wait a second, why are there no C# quotes?
sed -e 's/java/c#/i' should do it
--
# Kurt H Maier
Wait a second, why are there no C# quotes?
--
Jake Todd
// If it isn't broke, tweak it!
pgpuRs6Lw3g4z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 7/1/09, Kris Maglione wrote:
> Programming X Windows is like trying to find the square root of Pi
> using roman numerals.
> --Unknown
Henry Spencer
I don't know, but it clearly seems a logical argument that Kris is
making. Trying to apply logic and consistency to writing and language
is hard, but well worth it. (I'm very bad at it, I might add.)
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Kris Maglion
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> Brackets in quoted material signify a change by the by the person doing the
> quoting (e.g., "[The commission] was set..." as opposed to "It was set...").
> Parens generally signify parenthetical material added by the original
> author.
I woul
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 05:54:54PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
either this is a really clever troll or else I'm going to need to know
where you heard this
the brackets don't affect the meaning of 'sic' in the least
Brackets in quoted material signify a change by the by the
person doing the quo
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> It should be [sic] when you're modifying a quote, (sic) when you're
> clarifying your own writing.
either this is a really clever troll or else I'm going to need to know
where you heard this
the brackets don't affect the meaning of 'sic' in t
Interesting, I had (sic) because it is what Boyd had when he sent me
the quote years ago, I'm not sure why I removed it at some point.
Corrected it now to [sic], although it might be that ken actually did
write '(sic)' himself?
Ah, the mysteries of quoting combined with the wonders of the English
Nice collection, I added some of them to my collection.
The C++ == octopus made by nailing extra legs to a dog is one of the
best quotes ever, and is in my C++ page together with many other
wonderful C++ quotes ;) http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/
Oh, and the one about X being like calculati
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:18:53PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
Thanks for the correction, but I think that was a spelling mistake on
purpose, I will add (sic).
It should be [sic] when you're modifying a quote, (sic) when
you're clarifying your own writing.
--
Kris Maglione
I think conventional lang
Kris Maglione dixit (2009-07-01, 15:46):
> Measuring programming progress by lines of code is like measuring
> aircraft building progress by weight.
> --Bill Gates
What a pity.
--
[a]
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 02:41:04PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
lets use this thread to post your favorite programming quotes.
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog.
The key to performance is elegance, not battalions of special cases.
--Jon Bentley and Doug McIlroy
It's a curio
They are not exactly the same. I'm quite sure it was on purpose, you
should revert it again, hah.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Uriel wrote:
> Haha, thanks for spotting that, I wonder if it was on purpose :) I
> fixed it anyway.
>
> uriel
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
>>
Haha, thanks for spotting that, I wonder if it was on purpose :) I
fixed it anyway.
uriel
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> This is offtopic, but in fortunes.cat-v.org/kernelnewbies, the following quote
> is there twice:
>
> %
> "Thanks, and THIS time it really is fixed. I mean
> Just though I would let you know.
Thank you :D
This is offtopic, but in fortunes.cat-v.org/kernelnewbies, the following quote
is there twice:
%
"Thanks, and THIS time it really is fixed. I mean, how many times can we get
it wrong? At some point, we just have to run out of really bad ideas.."
- Linus Torvalds
Just though I would let
On 7/1/09, Uriel wrote:
> software philosophy, so take a look and lets use this thread to post
> your favorite programming quotes.
http://www-pu.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/users/klaeren/epigrams.html
- Alan J. Perlis
http://port70.net/~nsz/24_knuth.txt
- Knuth (from turing award lecture)
http:
Thanks for the correction, but I think that was a spelling mistake on
purpose, I will add (sic).
Peace
uriel
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Fernan Bolando wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Uriel wrote:
>> Just updated my online programming quotes archive, it contains some
>> quotes that
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Uriel wrote:
> Just updated my online programming quotes archive, it contains some
> quotes that in my opinion have inspired much of the 'suckless'
> software philosophy, so take a look and lets use this thread to post
> your favorite programming quotes.
>
> http://q
Just updated my online programming quotes archive, it contains some
quotes that in my opinion have inspired much of the 'suckless'
software philosophy, so take a look and lets use this thread to post
your favorite programming quotes.
http://quotes.cat-v.org/programming
Enjoy uriel
23 matches
Mail list logo
