Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-13 Thread sylvain . bertrand
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 11:15:11AM +0200, hiro wrote: > is C++ worse than glibc? (i would weight also by how much you can avoid it...) c++ with its libsdc++ is orders of magnitude worse than the glibc with a c compiler. It's like comparing lynx/links to chromium/firefox. Thx for the troll btw, :

Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-12 Thread hiro
is C++ worse than glibc? (i would weight also by how much you can avoid it...)

Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-12 Thread sylvain . bertrand
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 03:02:55PM +0200, Quentin Rameau wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > I did already say that, but remember that C compilers are being kind > > of phased out by force: > > > >- many "standard"/critical applications and even system components > > are forcing modern c++. > > Fo

Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-11 Thread Quentin Rameau
> Hi, Hi, > I did already say that, but remember that C compilers are being kind > of phased out by force: > >- many "standard"/critical applications and even system components > are forcing modern c++. For example? >- modern c++ can only be compiled with a modern c++ > compiler/runtim

Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-11 Thread sylvain . bertrand
Hi, I did already say that, but remember that C compilers are being kind of phased out by force: - many "standard"/critical applications and even system components are forcing modern c++. - modern c++ can only be compiled with a modern c++ compiler/runtime. It's very sad, but above all i

Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-10 Thread hiro
plumb: can't send message: couldn't find destination for message

Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-10 Thread S. R. Gal
> [1] gopher://bitreich.org > [2] gopher://bitreich.org/1/scm/scc/log.gph sed 'gopher:/,https://gopherproxy.meulie.net,' sucks, but works. s.

Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-09 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi Roberto, On 9 August 2017 at 21:12, Roberto E. Vargas wrote: > A lot of different things happened since that moment, some of > them in my life, and some of them in the suckless community. > Due to these changes, I don't feel scc as a suckless project > anymore, and as project founder, main con

Re: [dev] Moving scc

2017-08-09 Thread Silvan Jegen
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:12:45PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas wrote: > After this mail, the new official community where scc is going > to be developed is bitreich [1], and you can find the new > repository in [2]. Sad to see it go but I will still follow its development if I find the time! Cheers

[dev] Moving scc

2017-08-09 Thread Roberto E. Vargas
Hi, It is long time since I began to collaborate with suckless, I think almost 6 years. In that time I send patches for a lot of different projects, but the majority of them were for st, becoming eventually the maintainer of it. But this mail is not about all these projects, it is about scc, the