On 28/11/2014, Martti Kühne wrote:
> I always have it in the back of my head that I want to make a slightly
> better C. Just to clean up some of the rough edges and fix some of the
> more egregious problems. But getting everything to fit, top to bottom,
> syntax, semantics, tooling, etc., might no
Urm, relevant. From [0]:
I always have it in the back of my head that I want to make a slightly
better C. Just to clean up some of the rough edges and fix some of the
more egregious problems. But getting everything to fit, top to bottom,
syntax, semantics, tooling, etc., might not be possible or e
On 27/11/2014, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> • Unambiguous grammar
> • Low level
> • Tuples
> • Easy interface with C
Forgot one:
• Free declaration order
On 27/11/2014, Troels Henriksen wrote:
> The only implementation seems to be written in a pretty atrocious style:
> https://github.com/strake/pkc/b
M Farkas-Dyck writes:
> Given the comments on alternatives to C lately on dev@ I thought this
> a good time to introduce mine: http://k-lang.org/
The only implementation seems to be written in a pretty atrocious style:
https://github.com/strake/pkc/blob/master/CodeGen/Common.hs
Also - why care
On 27/11/2014, FRIGN wrote:
> No, bloody you!
...
I'm proposing the language. If you want to claim that my language
won't work, and fill out the checklist, feel free; I'll be over here,
using it.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:35:42 -0500
M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> Who? "You" is a 2nd-person pronoun.
Richard Stallman of course.
...
No, bloody you!
--
FRIGN
On 27/11/2014, FRIGN wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:47:08 -0500
> M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
>>
>
> Fill out the checklist[0] already (just copy/paste it in your
> mail-client and tick) ;)
Who? "You" is a 2nd-person pronoun.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:47:08 -0500
M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
>
Fill out the checklist[0] already (just copy/paste it in your
mail-client and tick) ;)
Cheers
FRIGN
[0]: http://colinm.org/language_checklist.html
--
FRIGN
On 27/11/2014, Wander Nauta wrote:
> What does your language have to offer? Is it safety? Expressiveness?
> Productivity? Ease of use?
• Unambiguous grammar
• Low level
• Tuples
• Easy interface with C
> Do K programs run faster than C programs?
Not in general.
> Also, what is a 'for loop afte
c makes hidden heap allocations? Wat
> On 27 Nov 2014, at 19:39, Wander Nauta wrote:
>
> What does your language have to offer? Is it safety? Expressiveness?
> Productivity? Ease of use? Do K programs run faster than C programs?
>
> Also, what is a 'for loop afterthot' (sic), why are the oper
What does your language have to offer? Is it safety? Expressiveness?
Productivity? Ease of use? Do K programs run faster than C programs?
Also, what is a 'for loop afterthot' (sic), why are the operators all
weird, why do you use parentheses where every C-like language uses
braces and why are inte
Given the comments on alternatives to C lately on dev@ I thought this
a good time to introduce mine: http://k-lang.org/
The goal is a language appropriate for systems programs including
kernels, sans some flaws of C. This likely means no hidden heap
allocations.
This is very much a work in progre
12 matches
Mail list logo
