On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 03:48:33 +0300
ilab...@gmail.com wrote:
> As for patents and stuff, it is true that DjVu is somewhat more free
> and provides reference implementation that can both read and write
> files.
PDF is an industry standard and I will not ditch it for DjVu which only
seems to be popu
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:20:57PM +0200, Hadrien LACOUR wrote:
> Well, because of the massive compression improvements, and because I prefer
> free stuff.
>
Massive compression improvements of DjVu are due to MRC, not some
superior compression. PDF MRC document with JPEG2000 and JB2 is almost
the
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:14:25 +0100, Cág wrote:
>[0]: http://repo.or.cz/fbpdf.git
Thanks, it seems acceptable. Even if it'd be better if mupdf could do djvu
(but I'm daydreaming here).
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:46:58PM +0300, ilab...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why would you want to do this? It makes som
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:23:52AM +0200, Hadrien LACOUR wrote:
> I'm becoming interested in converting all my PDFs to Djvu
Why would you want to do this? It makes some sense to save new scans to
DjVu because the format is simplier, but converting one lossy format to
another lossy format is not a
Hadrien LACOUR wrote:
I'm becoming interested in converting all my PDFs to Djvu, but I don't
seem to find a relatively not bloated viewer (like Mupdf). Looked at
zathura-djvu, djview and apvlv. They all require some sort of toolkit
(Qt or gtk+3) and even the dbus cancer.
Any recommendation?
H
Hello,
I'm becoming interested in converting all my PDFs to Djvu, but I don't
seem to find a relatively not bloated viewer (like Mupdf). Looked at
zathura-djvu, djview and apvlv. They all require some sort of toolkit
(Qt or gtk+3) and even the dbus cancer.
Any recommendation?
