On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:24:39PM +1000, Nathan Hutchison wrote:
But on the other hand, a lot of functions that you might like to have
inlined will not be, and a lot of functions will be dynamic, when in fact,
no one is using them, at all.
Statically linked libraries don't do inlining either.
On May 23, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott
wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:01:55AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott
wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:17:18AM +0200, pancake wrote:
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
Ju
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:01:55AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:17:18AM +0200, pancake wrote:
>>> http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
>>>
>>> Just my first time I see this minimal devel distro :)
>>
>
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:24:39PM +1000, Nathan Hutchison wrote:
> I agree with some of the points you raise Kris, imagine staticly linked KDE
> p.
>
> But on the other hand, a lot of functions that you might like to have
> inlined will not be, and a lot of functions will be dynamic, when in
Concise you are not sir.
> Gnome is better than Ktorrent anyway.
Okay, now you're not even trying. :)
Thomas
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:24:39PM +1000, Nathan Hutchison wrote:
> I agree with some of the points you raise Kris, imagine staticly linked KDE
> p.
>
> But on the other hand, a lot
I agree with some of the points you raise Kris, imagine staticly linked KDE
p.
But on the other hand, a lot of functions that you might like to have
inlined will not be, and a lot of functions will be dynamic, when in fact,
no one is using them, at all.
So I think the key is controlling what
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:17:18AM +0200, pancake wrote:
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
Just my first time I see this minimal devel distro :)
uClibc is by no means minimal, even though it's smaller than glibc.
In my opi
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:17:18AM +0200, pancake wrote:
> http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
>
> Just my first time I see this minimal devel distro :)
uClibc is by no means minimal, even though it's smaller than glibc.
In my opinion a minimal system has all libraries in source code form
and statica
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
Just my first time I see this minimal devel distro :)
