Re: [dev] Compilers

2011-11-12 Thread Truls Becken
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 17:33, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > Clang (cool, but bytecode) What do you mean? Yes, LLVM uses what it calls bitcode as part of the process, but the final result is a native binary. -Truls

Re: [dev] Compilers

2011-11-12 Thread Jakub Lach
side note: clang 3.0 binaries are faster here (penryn) than gcc46's MOAR POWAH!1 PS. No, I will not build audio encoders with fucking pcc. Actually, I may try it for amusement.

Re: [dev] Compilers

2011-11-12 Thread Jacob Todd
8c.

[dev] Compilers

2011-11-12 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
I know members of this list have endorsed and even suggested use of tcc and nwcc. While tcc is interesting, and may compile C89 programs, it lacks some C99 features. C1X may not be implemented at all. And while icc may be a fine compiler, it's proprietary. For a compiler, that's unacceptable.