2013/4/13 Jens Staal
> Sorry about the late reply. A pkgsrc and musl libc based distro I have been
> meaning to try is Snowflake
>
> https://github.com/GregorR/snowflake
>
> It seems to have some interesting ideas like "per application view of the
> file
> system".
>
> No idea how useable it is a
On Thursday 11 April 2013 12.02.42 Hugues Moretto-Viry wrote:
> 2013/4/11 Patrick Haller <201009-suckl...@haller.ws>
>
> > Anyway, pancake's contributing to voidlinux so I'll try void. Any other
> > good rolling release distros?
>
> Didn't know it. I'll give it a try. Thank you.
>
> --
> H.Moret
Shouldnt be hard to make a void base-system-minit package. In fact it was using
sysvinit before. There are also musl, static and crosscompilation profiles. Its
just a matter of hands and time :P systemd was chosed at first because it was
replacing about 15 packages and this made the pkg maintain
tinycore and crux come without systemd
> Anyway, pancake's contributing to voidlinux so I'll try void. Any other
> good rolling release distros?
>From the voidlinux page:
Speed, reliability, and flexibility. That's the battle-cry of today's
disgruntled computer geeks. This is what people want with a Linux
distribution, and this is wha
2013/4/11 Patrick Haller <201009-suckl...@haller.ws>
> Anyway, pancake's contributing to voidlinux so I'll try void. Any other
> good rolling release distros?
>
Didn't know it. I'll give it a try. Thank you.
--
H.Moretto
* Patrick Haller <201009-suckl...@haller.ws> [2013-04-11 04:30]:
On 2013-04-10 13:13, William Giokas wrote:
There are extremely strong technical arguments for using systemd as a
simple, easy to use and easy to configure initialization system.
systemd trades simplicity for boot-speed and stack
On 2013-04-10 13:13, William Giokas wrote:
> There are extremely strong technical arguments for using systemd as a
> simple, easy to use and easy to configure initialization system.
systemd trades simplicity for boot-speed and stack integration.
There are always trade-offs. It's just this seems l
Calvin Morrison dixit:
>What is the problem though? for me initialization should be
>ridiculously simple. init should call a simple script, that script
>contains the daemons you want to run, or anything else you want to do
>during boot, including starting networking, login prompts and stuff.
That
On 10 April 2013 16:45, Alex Pilon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:13:51PM -0500, William Giokas wrote:
>> […] you can actually disable almost every feature in systemd with
>> configure flags.
>
> * You can't disable DBus.
>
> Sure, sure, a lot of the rest of the world out there uses DBus. I
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:13:51PM -0500, William Giokas wrote:
> […] you can actually disable almost every feature in systemd with
> configure flags.
* You can't disable DBus.
Sure, sure, a lot of the rest of the world out there uses DBus. I
don't unless I have to. It's not just accommodatin
Greetings.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:17:58 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:44:34PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > You can’t easily build Archlinux your way and it’s not modular. You
> > are using the rhetoric of the systemd authors, which slowly
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:44:34PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:34 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > > The »basic core« shouldn’t be using systemd or udev. You ca
Greetings.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:34 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > The »basic core« shouldn’t be using systemd or udev. You can boot Linux
> > into udevtmpfs and no init scripts without systemd and jus
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:59:18 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > > Greetings comrades,
> > >
> > > I have been rediscovering p
I 2006 or so i did a linux distro based on pkgsrc based on debian.
(named bluewall)
I contributed a lot of packages to the repo, but probably for the lack
of interest and the lack of contributors i stopped contributing to it.
after moving to archlinux for a while, now i'm a happy void user.
Greetings.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:59:18 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > Greetings comrades,
> >
> > I have been rediscovering pkgsrc due to the inability of the Arch devel‐
> > opers to keep to their principl
Christoph Lohmann dixit:
>How are you using pkgsrc and how do you install a new system with just
>pkgsrc?
NetBSD® pkgsrc® is a method to install a set of packages
on top of a base system, like all the BSDs have.
I guess you’ll need a minimal GNU/Linux system below it,
maybe https://github.com/
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
>
> I have been rediscovering pkgsrc due to the inability of the Arch devel‐
> opers to keep to their principles. I know pkgsrc has its merits because
> of its portability, but it’s flexible.
Might I ask wha
Greetings comrades,
I have been rediscovering pkgsrc due to the inability of the Arch devel‐
opers to keep to their principles. I know pkgsrc has its merits because
of its portability, but it’s flexible.
So a call to all Linux users of pkgsrc:
How are you using pkgsrc and how do you install a
20 matches
Mail list logo
