It's reliable if you want only the audio and not the video ;)
* hiro <23h...@gmail.com> [2014-06-03 21:05:23 +0200]:
> choose a stream, meaning of itags is on wikipedia article of youtube.
> wget -q -O - 'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux1Za8Wmz_s'|sed
> 's/"/\n/g; s/\\u0026/ /g; s/,/\n/g'|sed -n
> '/url_encoded_fmt_stream_map/,/^$/p; /adaptive_fmts/,/^$/p'
>
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:05:23PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> choose a stream, meaning of itags is on wikipedia article of youtube.
> wget -q -O - 'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux1Za8Wmz_s'|sed
> 's/"/\n/g; s/\\u0026/ /g; s/,/\n/g'|sed -n
> '/url_encoded_fmt_stream_map/,/^$/p; /adaptive_fmts/,/^$/p'
>
but beware: they lowered audio quality in general recently. whereas I
used to get 192kbit vorbis in the past now I can only get 128kbit,
both in the normal 720p/1080p video and the pure audio versions.
it might be that the itag 141 and 172 are not available, even though
the example I posted seems t
yes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube#Quality_and_codecs
itag bitrate
139[3] MP4 AAC 48
140 MP4 AAC 128
141[3] MP4 AAC 256
171 WebMVorbis 128
172[3] WebMVorbis 192
Quoth hiro:
> One very nice new thing i discovered by going the manual way without
> the stupid quvi (which sadly randomly stopped working at some point
> for me) was that they now at least they have pure audio files
> together with that adaptive streaming bullshit, so I don't need ffmpeg
> for my
choose a stream, meaning of itags is on wikipedia article of youtube.
wget -q -O - 'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux1Za8Wmz_s'|sed
's/"/\n/g; s/\\u0026/ /g; s/,/\n/g'|sed -n
'/url_encoded_fmt_stream_map/,/^$/p; /adaptive_fmts/,/^$/p'
One very nice new thing i discovered by going the manual way wi
> - not use GNOME
As a matter of fact, I don't have gnome. But, having "any high
level script" bindings in order to customize the gnome desktop is
ok... till it's not mandatory for a reasonnably featured
desktop. If I'm not wrong, gnome desktop APIs are based on
gobject which can be interacted wi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> You missed the points.
>
> I don't want "standard" distro integration to be a massive work.
> Now it's near unreasonable to integrate a proper desktop distro
> alone, and it's quite worse from a "SDK" point of view. It's good
> for the bus
> Yes; you could go change it to embed Lua.
Sure. And all the used external lua modules too.
Should have been a C toolbox, not lua scripts...
What a pain!
--
Sylvain
You missed the points.
I don't want "standard" distro integration to be a massive work.
Now it's near unreasonable to integrate a proper desktop distro
alone, and it's quite worse from a "SDK" point of view. It's good
for the business of distro integration: coze a small team, or a
sole coder canno
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 04:14:21PM +0200, Teodoro Santoni wrote:
> You're speaking like you're using some OS in which, during runtime,
> the code of that software written with a scripting language
> is passed through a dispatcher that recalls namespace sessions
> and, then, to a limited number of
You're speaking like you're using some OS in which, during runtime,
the code of that software written with a scripting language
is passed through a dispatcher that recalls namespace sessions
and, then, to a limited number of scripting interpreters loaded
and daemonised in memory when available for
patrick295767 patrick295767 writes:
> Actually, this page http://suckless.org/rocks could be better.
> Many useful lightweight applications are not listed.
If you think something is missing, then present a commit(s) to the
submission queue, with your rationale in the commit message.
pgpcIJUaeQM1
- "Unless I’m mistaken, suckless in general advocates for
statically-linked standard C libraries of reasonable size.
http://suckless.org/rocks";
Actually, this page http://suckless.org/rocks could be better.
Many useful lightweight applications are not listed.
This very old, SC, is not listed.
The
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> Why would you do this? It's bloody idiotic, if you think about it. It
> would be like having all C programs ship their own libc. Have you seen
> how big perl is? Do you really want to have two perl installations just
> because two different
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 04:08:59PM +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately, libquvi on gentoo expects a system
> installed lua (with additional modules).
>
> I don't want this high level script language as a system
> dependency. I would prefer lua being packaged internally into
> l
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately, libquvi on gentoo expects a system
> installed lua (with additional modules).
>
> I don't want this high level script language as a system
> dependency. I would prefer lua being packaged internally into
> libquvi. [R
On Thu, 15 May 2014 16:08:59 +0200
Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Unfortunately, libquvi on gentoo expects a system
> installed lua (with additional modules).
> I don't want this high level script language as a system
> dependency. I would prefer lua being packaged internally into
> libquvi. Coze I wo
Hi,
Unfortunately, libquvi on gentoo expects a system
installed lua (with additional modules).
I don't want this high level script language as a system
dependency. I would prefer lua being packaged internally into
libquvi. Coze I would like to quit gentoo one day and have my own
suckless-ish dist
many many many thanks. Awesome post !!
2014-05-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Dmitrij D. Czarkoff :
> patrick295767 patrick295767 said:
>> One can retrieve the link and send it over mplayer on nix, vlc,... and
>> any win32 apps as well.
>
> quvi dump -b mute -e "ffplay %u" $URL
>
> --
> Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
>
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> quvi dump -b mute -e "ffplay %u" $URL
Heyho,
since mpv uses quvi internally you could also just use:
mpv $URL
--Markus
patrick295767 patrick295767 said:
> One can retrieve the link and send it over mplayer on nix, vlc,... and
> any win32 apps as well.
quvi dump -b mute -e "ffplay %u" $URL
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:57:56PM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> One can retrieve the link and send it over mplayer on nix, vlc,... and
> any win32 apps as well.
Your drugs suck.
One can retrieve the link and send it over mplayer on nix, vlc,... and
any win32 apps as well.
2014-05-07 19:33 GMT+02:00 Ryan O’Hara :
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:29 AM, patrick295767 patrick295767
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was watching a movie on youtube, and finally I realized that we
>> still h
Hi,
I was watching a movie on youtube, and finally I realized that we
still haven't coded an application, such as we were doing 10-20 years
ago.
Why we still so heavily use the browser, when so much is possible with
coding in C.
Well you might you youtube python app, but it is so much marvellous
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:29 AM, patrick295767 patrick295767
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was watching a movie on youtube, and finally I realized that we
> still haven't coded an application, such as we were doing 10-20 years
> ago.
>
> Why we still so heavily use the browser, when so much is possible with
27 matches
Mail list logo
