e >'s when I switched to plain text. Hope
this clears it up:
> > From: Matt Mrozinski
> > > Subject: [dev] Aterm not running properly in dwm
> > > To: dev@suckless.org
> > > Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 12:25 PM
> > >
> > > I can&#
I actually have tried that option to xterm (+bdc). It doesn't seem
to affect my bold fonts, as they are still fat and unreadable. One thing
I have noticed however, is when I start one Aterm instance (MOD+aterm)
and then another, the second instance is slightly wider than the other.
If I focus t
Hello,
mikshaw wrote:
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Matt Mrozinski wrote:
From: Matt Mrozinski
Subject: [dev] Aterm not running properly in dwm
To: dev@suckless.org
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 12:25 PM
I can't seem to find documentation anywhere on this, so here's the problem:
In
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Matt Mrozinski wrote:
From: Matt Mrozinski
Subject: [dev] Aterm not running properly in dwm
To: dev@suckless.org
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 12:25 PM
I can't seem to find documentation anywhere on this, so here's the problem:
In Arch Linux 64 bit,
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Matt Mrozinski wrote:
> I suppose i dont really like the way the bold fonts are really bold in those
> terminals, to the point where they're unreadable. Tho i have to admit, i
> haven't spent a lot of time playing with them. I'll give them a chance
> again, to be s
Matt Mrozinski dixit (2011-02-26, 21:20):
> I suppose i dont really like the way the bold fonts are really bold
> in those terminals, to the point where they're unreadable. Tho i
> have to admit, i haven't spent a lot of time playing with them.
> I'll give them a chance again, to be sure.
>From
I suppose i dont really like the way the bold fonts are really bold in those
terminals, to the point where they're unreadable. Tho i have to admit, i
haven't spent a lot of time playing with them. I'll give them a chance again,
to be sure.
- Original message -
> Standard terminal on t
Standard terminal on tinycorelinux, too lazy to debug or find alternatives.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> This sounds - to me - like aterm doesn't support being managed by a
> windowmanager that has it's own idea of window resizing (tiling wm)
>
> urxvt and xterm are k
This sounds - to me - like aterm doesn't support being managed by a
windowmanager that has it's own idea of window resizing (tiling wm)
urxvt and xterm are known to work.
Why are you using aterm, if I may ask?
I have the same problem with wmii + aterm.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Matt Mrozinski wrote:
> I can't seem to find documentation anywhere on this, so here's the problem:
>
> In Arch Linux 64 bit, when I run aterm in fullscreen (tiling mode) and vim a
> file which requires scrolling beyond t
I can't seem to find documentation anywhere on this, so here's the
problem:
In Arch Linux 64 bit, when I run aterm in fullscreen (tiling
mode) and vim a file which requires scrolling beyond the physical screen
size, aterm will simply open the file in a small portion of the
fullscreen terminal
11 matches
Mail list logo
