Martin,
there is much wisdom in what you write. and, the text you cited (i
summarize as "write once, throw it away; write it again another day") is
also very powerful. the problem, ultimately, is understanding what the
problem to be solved actually is, wrestling with that problem until you
reall
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021, at 14:02, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> I have written this article at the link below.
>
> https://designman.org/sagaracharya/blog/pretend_computer_security
>
> It enhances the value of suckless by pointing the problems in gigantic
> softwares. Let me know what you think.
I'm remi
On 21/08/07 08:02, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> It enhances the value of suckless by pointing the problems in gigantic
> softwares. Let me know what you think.
The plural form of "software" is "software". "Softwares" is not a real word in
English.
> Thanking you
*Thank you
> It enhances the value of
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
>
>> Just 1 thing needs to be done, make easier for a majority to use minimal,
>> secure software and make it harder for majority to use gigantic, malware
>> injected software. And things would become better.
>>
> Sadly not possi
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 02:54:18PM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> >
> >> Just 1 thing needs to be done, make easier for a majority to use minimal,
> >> secure software and make it harder for majority to use gigantic, malware
>
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 06:59:08AM -0600, Lincoln Auster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Anyway, you're correct, and that's why modularity (which needs a
> > better interchange format than UNIX's stream of bytes, to be honest)
>
> This is pretty irrelevant to the original email, but in terms of IPC
> protocols,
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 08:02:31AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> I have written this article at the link below.
>
> https://designman.org/sagaracharya/blog/pretend_computer_security
>
> It enhances the value of suckless by pointing the problems in gigantic
> softwares. Let me know what you think
Hi,
> Anyway, you're correct, and that's why modularity (which needs a
> better interchange format than UNIX's stream of bytes, to be honest)
This is pretty irrelevant to the original email, but in terms of IPC
protocols, what would you suggest instead?
I've been writing a small application with
Aug 7, 2021, 1:03 PM by hadrien.lac...@posteo.net:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 08:02:31AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
>
>> I have written this article at the link below.
>>
>> https://designman.org/sagaracharya/blog/pretend_computer_security
>>
>> It enhances the value of suckless by pointing the pr
I have written this article at the link below.
https://designman.org/sagaracharya/blog/pretend_computer_security
It enhances the value of suckless by pointing the problems in gigantic
softwares. Let me know what you think.
Thanking you
Sagar Acharya
https://designman.org
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> Just 1 thing needs to be done, make easier for a majority to use minimal,
> secure software and make it harder for majority to use gigantic, malware
> injected software. And things would become better.
Sadly not possible, as the who
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 08:02:31AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> I have written this article at the link below.
>
> https://designman.org/sagaracharya/blog/pretend_computer_security
>
> It enhances the value of suckless by pointing the problems in gigantic
> softwares. Let me know what you think.
12 matches
Mail list logo
