On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:50:24AM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Does anyone here have some experience with it?
I have had it installed on my laptop for a while. But since I hardly
use my laptop...
What I can say: openrc is... not suckless: it's a kludge of
scripts which try to manage all possible
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jens Staal wrote:
> [...]
>
> I am dual booting this distro at the moment. Very easy to install and set-up
> with nice instructions on the web page.
Sounds good!
> I definitely find it a desktop-class distro (however due to various needs,
> especially Libre Offi
On Friday 06 June 2014 10:50:24 Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I just learned that Alpine Linux[0] has switched to musl libc[1]. The
> following are the most interesting facts about Alpine Linux:
>
> * No GNU tools (using busybox)
> * musl libc (still in Beta though)
> * OpenRC initsystem
On 6 June 2014 10:50, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I just learned that Alpine Linux[0] has switched to musl libc[1]. The
> following are the most interesting facts about Alpine Linux:
>
> * No GNU tools (using busybox)
> * musl libc (still in Beta though)
> * OpenRC initsystem
> * Using t
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:50:24AM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I just learned that Alpine Linux[0] has switched to musl libc[1]. The
> following are the most interesting facts about Alpine Linux:
>
> * No GNU tools (using busybox)
> * musl libc (still in Beta though)
> * OpenRC i
Hi everyone
I just learned that Alpine Linux[0] has switched to musl libc[1]. The
following are the most interesting facts about Alpine Linux:
* No GNU tools (using busybox)
* musl libc (still in Beta though)
* OpenRC initsystem
* Using their own package manager called apk[2]; C source is here[3]
