On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:49:51 +
Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> But, think of the hyphens!
>
> Not that this should cause any trouble with existing rm
> implementations, but you'll never know what syntactic extensions GNU
> might come up with for userspace in-rm chroot filesystem hierarchies.
[2012-02-14 21:55] Bjartur Thorlacius
>
> Thanks for a great reading. :)
Full Ack.
meillo
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:55:50PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> Do you intend to compile all modules you might use into a single perl
> binary? Or just enough to compile stuff, and then stick to shell
> scripts and Lisp?
Perl has facilities to easily embed modules. In my opinion, the be
Thanks for a great reading. :)
On Feb 14, 2012, at 7:26 PM, Paul Onyschuk wrote:
I compiled almost whole Xorg (statically linked) from pkgsrc. Only
missing part is xkeyboard-config, which depends on intltool. Intltool
requires XML Parser module for Perl. I used static build of Perl, so
dynamic
On Feb 14, 2012, at 7:26 PM, Paul Onyschuk wrote:
# find / -name "*.so*" | xargs rm
But, think of the hyphens!
Not that this should cause any trouble with existing rm
implementations, but you'll never know what syntactic extensions GNU
might come up with for userspace in-rm chroot filesyste
Skip this message if you're not interested in Stali Linux concepts and
static linking in general. Apologies for my poor writing skills in
English.
BACKGROUND
I'll not write about advantages and disadvantages of static linking,
you can find informations about that on Stali web page. Moreover
cre
