Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
It is also necessary set WINDOWID, because it is the XWindow ID of the terminal. I suppouse w3m needs this variable to print images in the terminal.

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> How is this a possible security risk? St shouldn’t be used to control > login shells. It’s there to show escape sequences jump around on a > screen. The problem is that the terminal emulation is too much related to the pty stuff. The program who create the master/slave is the responsabl

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> > And if SHELL is not set, st before this patch segfault. > > Actually, this is a simple check to just use »/bin/sh«. Which environ‐ > ment today does not have SHELL set? The code set SHELL only if is not set (3rd parameter of setenv). SHELL can be unset if a ugly user unset it ;).

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> That e‐mail has several reason to not support utmpx. The proposed patch > has the same size of an equal dbus interface that would call some kind > of logind. That’s the kind of cruft people complain about before they > start to reinvent it using Javascript or Go. xterm uses libutempter, wh

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:31:50 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" wrote: > > > > Relay in correct values of LOGNAME and USER is a security risk. If st > > doesn't check against /etc/passwd you can get who(1) shows other user as > > connected, for example. Usually these variables are se

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Hello. On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:25:29 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" wrote: > > This patch is fixing something st shouldn’t do. In my environment all > > the environment variables you propose to add are set. That’s something > > the shell should do and not the terminal emulator. A term

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:20:53 +0200 "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote: > "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" writes: > > This patch adds utmpx support in st, which means that st sessions > > will be visible using who or, who is the correct behaviour of a terminal > > emulator, but this means th

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> > Relay in correct values of LOGNAME and USER is a security risk. If st > doesn't check against /etc/passwd you can get who(1) shows other user as > connected, for example. Usually these variables are set by login(1), and > like a terminal emulator is doing the login job, setting these variables

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> This patch is fixing something st shouldn’t do. In my environment all > the environment variables you propose to add are set. That’s something > the shell should do and not the terminal emulator. A terminal emulator > should be neutral to this. Sorry, but I think you are fixing something

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
"Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" writes: > This patch adds utmpx support in st, which means that st sessions > will be visible using who or, who is the correct behaviour of a terminal > emulator, but this means that the binary needs have setgid, which is > something we have to thing carefully. >

Re: [dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Hello. On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:09:36 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" wrote: > Hello, > > This patch adds utmpx support in st, which means that st sessions > will be visible using who or, who is the correct behaviour of a terminal > emulator, but this means that the binary needs have se

[dev] Adding utmpx stuff

2012-10-09 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Hello, This patch adds utmpx support in st, which means that st sessions will be visible using who or, who is the correct behaviour of a terminal emulator, but this means that the binary needs have setgid, which is something we have to thing carefully. Other important about this