Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015, at 04:38 PM, FRIGN wrote: > Isn't it bad enough that we have these Arch-hipsters > on this ml who constantly discuss things without > providing patches? Would you like to discuss that issue? By the way, I've never encountered the term "Arch-hipster" before--very very amusing.

Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 17:35:11 -0700 Louis Santillan wrote: > Gopher server as a goal! I love it. Especially since > I've been reading up on the protocol recently. It's a lovely protocol! If only there was a way around the issue that gopher uses its own URL syntax. And even better than its lovel

Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

Gopher server as a goal! I love it. Especially since I've been reading up on the protocol recently. But seriously, when I need a light-weight, private Issue Tracker, I reach for cvstrac [0]. It supported SQLite for almost a decade before Richard Hipp replaced it with Fossil [1]. Supports cvs,

Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 23:08:18 +0200 FRIGN wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:58:49 +0200 > Mattias Andrée wrote: > > Hey Mattias, > > > Well it was on the list of software you needed, > > so I thought I could help out. (So no, it is not > > a NIH-timewaster.) > > > > I have not spent too much time

Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

Hi, On 6 April 2015 at 21:29, Mattias Andrée wrote: > I have just started on a simple issue tracker > [Write a decent bug and issue tracking system], > that I would like to make part of suckless.org > and develop under your mentorship. I'm afraid I can't help all that much, but despite FRIGN's p

Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:58:49 +0200 Mattias Andrée wrote: Hey Mattias, > Well it was on the list of software you needed, > so I thought I could help out. (So no, it is not > a NIH-timewaster.) > > I have not spent too much time researching the > area. (But I assumed you had.) The best solution >

Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

On 6 April 2015 at 21:58, Mattias Andrée wrote: > The best solution to the problem that I know if is bugseverywhere, but > [...] last time I used it, it was very buggy. Well at least the name serves as a warning. :) cls

Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:38:17 +0200 FRIGN wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:29:21 +0200 > Mattias Andrée wrote: > > > I have just started on a simple issue tracker > > [Write a decent bug and issue tracking system], > > that I would like to make part of suckless.org > > and develop under your mentor

Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:29:21 +0200 Mattias Andrée wrote: > I have just started on a simple issue tracker > [Write a decent bug and issue tracking system], > that I would like to make part of suckless.org > and develop under your mentorship. Yet another issue tracker ... Why on earth do people sp

[dev] A suckless issue tracker

Hi! I have just started on a simple issue tracker [Write a decent bug and issue tracking system], that I would like to make part of suckless.org and develop under your mentorship. You can find the progress so far at . My idea is to have an issue tracker similar t