Re: [dev] A Suckless Filesystem

2011-02-17 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 17:06 -0500, "Brandon LaRocque" wrote: > Which one do you use? Why do you use it? What does it have that the > others don't? For USB storage and bootloader partitions I've reverted to FAT, on the one because I got fed up with keeping UIDs in sync across multiple machines & on

Re: [dev] A Suckless Filesystem

2011-02-06 Thread Patrick Haller
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 05:06:20PM -0500, Brandon LaRocque wrote: > Which one do you use? Why do you use it? What does it have that the > others don't? XFS because http://www.jukie.net/bart/blog/usb2-enclosure-benchmark Lots of tradeoffs with FSs, how about tackle userland first? Patrick

Re: [dev] A Suckless Filesystem

2011-02-05 Thread Antoni Grzymala
w...@tivy.com dixit (2011-02-05, 16:20): > >Which one do you use? Why do you use it? What does it have that the > >others don't? > > ext2. I forget why. Probably because I didn't know anything when I > installed archlinux. > > I've heard good things about JFS. I've looked at the different FS's b

RE: [dev] A Suckless Filesystem

2011-02-05 Thread wolf
>Which one do you use? Why do you use it? What does it have that the >others don't? ext2. I forget why. Probably because I didn't know anything when I installed archlinux. I've heard good things about JFS. I've looked at the different FS's but I can't really identify one as being obviously suckle

[dev] A Suckless Filesystem

2011-02-05 Thread Brandon LaRocque
Which one do you use? Why do you use it? What does it have that the others don't?