On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 08:19:19PM +0200, hiro wrote:
>
> Yeah, thank god. What would the world be without debian developers?
hopefully a world with better debian developers
tube
> But yet you use the "awful" Debian... Good that some thousand developer
> devote time to package software for you then.
Yeah, thank god. What would the world be without debian developers?
Don't take the criticism too serious, I'm sure deep inside these
cynics are very grateful for the things man
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:43:23 +0200
Uriel wrote:
> I don't have a lifetime to spend studying all the debian arcana and
> follow their byzantine bureaucracy.
But yet you use the "awful" Debian... Good that some thousand developer
devote time to package software for you then.
Put up or shut up...
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Uriel wrote:
> I don't have a lifetime to spend studying all the debian arcana and
> follow their byzantine bureaucracy.
I guess you'll just have to learn bash then
--
# Kurt H Maier
I don't have a lifetime to spend studying all the debian arcana and
follow their byzantine bureaucracy.
uriel
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:00:48 +0200
> Uriel wrote:
>
>> To me, the only difference is that unlike p9p, 9base does get packaged
>>
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:00:48 +0200
Uriel wrote:
> To me, the only difference is that unlike p9p, 9base does get packaged
> into Debian. Aside from that I see little benefit. It is rather sad
> that nobody packages p9p for Debian, but seems to be a lost battle
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/
That would be really *wonderful. No, seriously, I would love to see that.
Thanks!
uriel
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Uriel wrote:
>> To me, the only difference is that unlike p9p, 9base does get packaged
>> into Debian.
>
> i should get arround to do p9p finally. but
Uriel wrote:
> To me, the only difference is that unlike p9p, 9base does get packaged
> into Debian.
i should get arround to do p9p finally. but my time is also limited.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
In
On Fri 07 Aug 2009 at 00:56:29 PDT Anselm R Garbe wrote:
2009/8/7 Antony Jepson :
On 2009-08-06, Charlie Kester wrote:
Help me understand the pro's and con's here. Why/when should I use
9base rather than plan9port?
You could do a little research here to save us all some time. But, I
feel ge
To me, the only difference is that unlike p9p, 9base does get packaged
into Debian. Aside from that I see little benefit. It is rather sad
that nobody packages p9p for Debian, but seems to be a lost battle
(and no, the building of the .debs is not the issue, the issue is that
a Debian developer has
2009/8/7 Antony Jepson :
> On 2009-08-06, Charlie Kester wrote:
>> Help me understand the pro's and con's here. Why/when should I use
>> 9base rather than plan9port?
>
> You could do a little research here to save us all some time. But, I
> feel generous, so:
>
> The major differences between the
On 2009-08-06, Charlie Kester wrote:
> Help me understand the pro's and con's here. Why/when should I use
> 9base rather than plan9port?
You could do a little research here to save us all some time. But, I
feel generous, so:
The major differences between the two are size and the included
progra
On Thu 06 Aug 2009 at 13:08:06 PDT Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Hi there,
I revived the 9base project which was asleep for nearly 3 years som
days ago and created a new version based on Russ' plan9port from
20090731. You can download it from:
http://code.suckless.org/dl/tools/9base-3.tar.gz
its proj
Hi there,
I revived the 9base project which was asleep for nearly 3 years som
days ago and created a new version based on Russ' plan9port from
20090731. You can download it from:
http://code.suckless.org/dl/tools/9base-3.tar.gz
its project page can be found at:
http://tools.suckless.org/9ba
14 matches
Mail list logo
