On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Thomas Gallen wrote:
> Obviously fun should also be outlawed on the internet along with humor
> and curiousity.
And post poning
You make a good point! Then I suppose that means you could filter
out...this thread?
Thomas
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:55:13PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:15:54 +0100
> Alexander Clouter wrote:
>
> > Jeremy Jay wrote:
> > >
> > > As much as I love dwm and suckless pro
Obviously fun should also be outlawed on the internet along with humor
and curiousity.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 6/13/09, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> > I think XKCD were the first people to come up with a solution to this
> > problem[1].
> no he isn't
> th
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:15:54 +0100
Alexander Clouter wrote:
> Jeremy Jay wrote:
> >
> > As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I could
> > really do without all the off-topic conversations by the same 10
> > people. If there will not be split
> > suckless-dev/suckless-discussio
On 6/13/09, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> I think XKCD were the first people to come up with a solution to this
> problem[1].
no he isn't
that is the wrong solution to the wrong problem and has never worked,
just generates more noise
it does not make humans more intelligent or more bearable and
parti
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> I think XKCD were the first people to come up with a solution to this
> problem[1].
Attempting to solve social problems with code? Adorable. How did IRC
ever work before some guy's webcomic fixed its problems
--
# Kurt H Maier
Uriel wrote:
>
> P.S.: Perhaps having chat@ for random crap and relegating dev@ for
> only technical discussions would work, but often it is hard to know
> where to draw the line, and two lists with very low traffic are really
> a waste of time. Really given the insanely low traffic levels in thi
Jeremy Jay wrote:
>
> As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I could really
> do without all the off-topic conversations by the same 10 people. If
> there will not be split suckless-dev/suckless-discussion lists I will be
> unsubscribing. I hate to miss all the good code and pat
Phpbb > nntp
On Jun 12, 2009 2:05 PM, "David Engster" wrote:
James PIC writes: > I suggest make an NNTP group for
suckless, or open a PHPBB ...
A little remark: you can read the mailing list via nntp through Gmane
(gmane.comp.window-managers.wmii). Actually, that's what I do right now,
and ever
James PIC writes:
> I suggest make an NNTP group for suckless, or open a PHPBB FORUM.
A little remark: you can read the mailing list via nntp through Gmane
(gmane.comp.window-managers.wmii). Actually, that's what I do right now,
and every good News reader allows you to kill threads based on the
r
10 matches
Mail list logo
