Hi there,
On 9 August 2016 at 10:17, FRIGN wrote:
> don't take it personally, Bert, but I don't think your project sxiv[0]
> belongs to the suckless git-repository.
> Not only is it licensed with the GPLv2, which is despicable in itself,
> but the code doesn't even look suckless to me and there a
hah...@gmail.com wrote:
Haven't tried with compton, but i use:
https://github.com/ttzhou/setroot
This one works fine, thank you.
Cág
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, S. R. Gal wrote:
>> In fact, like you, I have also integrated `sxiv` into my "photography"
>> workflow, for both selecting potential images, and "analysing" them
>> with a few tools I've wrote myself.
>
> Would you mind sharing them?
I would share them, but unfor
[2016-08-11 21:13] Cág
>
> part text/plain 126
> Marc Collin wrote:
>
> > For wallpaper I suggest bgs.
> > https://github.com/Gottox/bgs
>
> It doesn't work well with compton.
Haven't tried with compton, but i use:
https://github.com/ttzhou/setroot
Marc Collin wrote:
For wallpaper I suggest bgs.
https://github.com/Gottox/bgs
It doesn't work well with compton.
Cág
> In fact, like you, I have also integrated `sxiv` into my "photography"
> workflow, for both selecting potential images, and "analysing" them
> with a few tools I've wrote myself.
Would you mind sharing them?
Sicerely,
S. R. Gal
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:09:44 +0200
Bert Münnich wrote:
Hey Bert,
> I was asked for sxiv becoming an official suckless project. I had
> nothing against that move. And I have nothing against reversing it.
I think there was a misunderstanding on my part. Does main development
happen on GitHub or a
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Bert Münnich wrote:
> There's already lel[0] that does just this. But sxiv is not only an
> image viewer. I heavily use it to organize my image library, e.g.
> visually selecting files to import from a huge collection of freshly
> taken photos or performing simple
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:55 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:33:06 +0200
> Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> Hey Christoph,
>
>> Everything should be GPLv3, you are right.
>
> let's not discuss this here. You know my position on the GPL,
> and I know yours.
>
>> Please don’t w
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:33:06 +0200
Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
Hey Christoph,
> Everything should be GPLv3, you are right.
let's not discuss this here. You know my position on the GPL,
and I know yours.
> Please don’t waste that much resources on viewing a big picture
> directory.
Greetings.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:33:06 +0200 FRIGN wrote:
> Hello fellow hackers,
>
> don't take it personally, Bert, but I don't think your project sxiv[0]
> belongs to the suckless git-repository.
> Not only is it licensed with the GPLv2, which is despicable in itself,
Everything should be G
> haha yeah. Fun fact: feh now supports farbfeld :) Try it out!
imlib2 supports farbfeld, so every front-end that uses the imlib2
library will support farbfeld too.
So not just feh, but also sxiv, jfbview,
> How about adding a wallpaper feature? Is it a complex solution?
One program for one
On 09.08.16, Cág wrote:
> How about adding a wallpaper feature? Is it a complex solution?
You can add a call to the wallpaper program of your choice to the
external key-handler.
Bert
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 21:51:54 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
> I see. That use case may make it harder to use farbfeld unless you
> want to change your whole image collection to this format.
> Theoretically, you could just use farbfeld as the intermediate image
> format to apply the changes to and then
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:39:47PM +0200, Bert Münnich wrote:
> On 09.08.16, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > If the conversion tools are already written (I wasn't sure this was
> > the case already) then all that's left to simplify sxiv would be to
> > make it speak only farbfeld and then to wrap it up in
How about adding a wallpaper feature? Is it a complex solution?
Right now I use feh for it, but browsing with feh is painful, so I use
gpicview for a quick preview from a file browser.
Today I tried sxiv and enjoyed it more than both, even though
it required
five libraries to be installed on my A
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:23:19PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 21:19:14 +0200
> Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > If the conversion tools are already written (I wasn't sure this was
> > the case already) then all that's left to simplify sxiv would be to
> > make it speak only farbfeld and then
On 09.08.16, FRIGN wrote:
> haha yeah. Fun fact: feh now supports farbfeld :) Try it out!
Thanks to the farbfeld loader in imlib2. sxiv uses that, too.
Bert
On 09.08.16, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> If the conversion tools are already written (I wasn't sure this was
> the case already) then all that's left to simplify sxiv would be to
> make it speak only farbfeld and then to wrap it up in a shell script
> (?) that converts all arguments to temporary farbfeld
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 21:19:14 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
Hey Silvan,
> feh has this odd right-click menu though. It's also surprisingly large
> (it also can set your background image...).
>
> [feh]$ wc -l `find . -name '*.c' -o -name '*.h'`
> [...]
> 17441 total
haha yeah. Fun fact: feh now supp
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:18:01PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:36:34 +0200
> Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > Personally, I would opt for taking out the thumbnail view and maybe
> > try to get rid of the font handling (if possible; maybe just use a key
> > press to write the file name to st
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:36:34 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
Hey Silvan,
> Personally, I would opt for taking out the thumbnail view and maybe
> try to get rid of the font handling (if possible; maybe just use a key
> press to write the file name to stdout?) to reduce the dependencies
> somewhat.
then
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:09:44PM +0200, Bert Münnich wrote:
> On 09.08.16, FRIGN wrote:
> > don't take it personally, Bert, but I don't think your project sxiv[0]
> > belongs to the suckless git-repository.
> > [...]
> > Do we really need a project the size of dwm to display images?
> > [...]
> >
On 09.08.16, FRIGN wrote:
> don't take it personally, Bert, but I don't think your project sxiv[0]
> belongs to the suckless git-repository.
> [...]
> Do we really need a project the size of dwm to display images?
> [...]
> What do you think?
I was asked for sxiv becoming an official suckless proj
Hello fellow hackers,
don't take it personally, Bert, but I don't think your project sxiv[0]
belongs to the suckless git-repository.
Not only is it licensed with the GPLv2, which is despicable in itself,
but the code doesn't even look suckless to me and there are good ways
to go around the whole i
25 matches
Mail list logo
