On 2013-04-26 23:11, hiro wrote:
> just mod your shell to always copy all stdout of commands into a temp
> file, then open the file with less after one of these stupidly long
> commands.
Or run them via 'at'
Or run 'script' when you login
And sed out all the terminal carp later on.
and a seperate one for stderr if you like...
> I use less for scrollback generally and it's fine. The reason it is
> useful for me to have an alternative is for cases where output is
> unexpectedly large, and rerunning the process isn't practical. Also
> getting lots of unexpected stderr output won't be handled well by
> less by default.
jus
Greetings.
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:47:32 +0200 Nick wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:45:04PM +0300, Edgaras wrote:
> > Frankly I'm now I'm fairly interested why would people need scroll back. I
> > do not use tmux or screen. Well I use dvtm but I dont use scroll back
> > functionality there.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:45:04PM +0300, Edgaras wrote:
> Frankly I'm now I'm fairly interested why would people need scroll back. I do
> not use tmux or screen. Well I use dvtm but I dont use scroll back
> functionality there. I find that "less" is mostly sufficient for my needs.
> And apps li
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, Nick wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:15:13AM +0800, Patrick Haller wrote:
> > On 2013-04-25 20:05, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > > while trying to copy some stuff from iotop I came to the idea of having
> > > some ??halt?? function in st. This is like t
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:15:13AM +0800, Patrick Haller wrote:
> On 2013-04-25 20:05, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > while trying to copy some stuff from iotop I came to the idea of having
> > some ??halt?? function in st. This is like the ??halt?? in 9term, where
> > ev???
> > erything will st
On 2013-04-25 20:05, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> while trying to copy some stuff from iotop I came to the idea of having
> some ??halt?? function in st. This is like the ??halt?? in 9term, where ev???
> erything will stand still but the terminal is working on the output in
> the background.
Why
2013/4/25, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> Greetings.
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:15:37 +0200 Nimrod Omer
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Anyone has ever needed such a function and considers it worth to
>> > be
>> > added to s
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013, at 14:15, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Nice joke. Try to implement a scrollback buffer without bugs and flaw‐
> lessly.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Christoph Lohmann
The buffer's the easy part. What's hard is actually implementing
scrolling.
I've been tempted to hack in a way to
Greetings.
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:15:37 +0200 Nimrod Omer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> > Anyone has ever needed such a function and considers it worth to be
> > added to st?
> >
>
> Oh, I've needed such a function--but I've also ne
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Anyone has ever needed such a function and considers it worth to be
> added to st?
>
Oh, I've needed such a function--but I've also needed a scroll-back buffer.
Greetings comrades,
while trying to copy some stuff from iotop I came to the idea of having
some »halt« function in st. This is like the »halt« in 9term, where ev‐
erything will stand still but the terminal is working on the output in
the background.
Anyone has ever needed such a functio
13 matches
Mail list logo
