On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:22:52PM -0500, Philip Rushik wrote:
> > did you try enabling the "Elevated" mode in the client (should be
> > selectable at the bottom of the main window)?
>
> Nope, because it's not a Windows machine, both machines are Linux.
>
> I did however get a chance to do a litt
> did you try enabling the "Elevated" mode in the client (should be
> selectable at the bottom of the main window)?
Nope, because it's not a Windows machine, both machines are Linux.
I did however get a chance to do a little debugging, although I wasn't
about to learn much. I discovered that when
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 21:19:24 -0500
Philip Rushik wrote:
Hey Philip,
> Also, the other issue I want to report is that st does not work with
> synergy's clipboard sharing feature.
did you try enabling the "Elevated" mode in the client (should be
selectable at the bottom of the main window)?
Cheer
> You can do some testing with xclip[0] which allows you to manipulate
> the clipboard and also see requests made to xclip from X to see
> what's going on. If run with the -quiet flag it will stay in the
> foreground and notify you of every request it gets. That way you can
> see if the clipboard s
st with scrollback: https://github.com/strake/st
On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 09:19:24PM -0500, Philip Rushik wrote:
> I have attempted to figure this out, but the mechanism st uses seems
> so simple and correct according to what I know of the X11 protocol, so
> I can't figure it out However, somebody here might know st better
> than I do.
You ca
Hi everybody,
I started using st at work on my work computers. At work we all use
linux boxes supplied by the company and we don't get full control over
them. I love st, I think it is by far the nicest terminal emulator
available, however, I needed scroll back and copy paste support to
play nice w
Hello.
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:55:50 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> > I applied the patch for it to have a reason to modularize the tsetchar()
> > function. I think this will be needed for another feature I have in
> > mind. Then the test loop will be removed.
>
> Uhmmm, you
> I applied the patch for it to have a reason to modularize the tsetchar()
> function. I think this will be needed for another feature I have in
> mind. Then the test loop will be removed.
Uhmmm, you could say me this and it was very easy for me split the patch and
keep only that part. Next
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 11:10:21AM +0200, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> I don't think the DEC alignment test is necessary. Please read LEGACY
> in st repo.
I duded about this, but like I was not sure I sent the patch to the list in
order to begin a discussion about this. You can see that the message in
Hello.
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:10:50 +0200 Aurélien Aptel
wrote:
> I don't think the DEC alignment test is necessary. Please read LEGACY
> in st repo.
I applied the patch for it to have a reason to modularize the tsetchar()
function. I think this will be needed for another feature I have in
I don't think the DEC alignment test is necessary. Please read LEGACY
in st repo.
>From cf7afccdebabaa5d1a9c6d80b2756af7b62cd712 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 09:23:20 +0200
Subject: Fix Identification sequences
Do not send NUL character in the identification (use (sizeof(VT102ID) - 1),
and finish the sequence once you exec
> how is -e not a solution?
Uhmmm, I suck ^^!. dmenu allows you write the full command line, so you can
use -e with it.
how is -e not a solution?
2012/9/20 Roberto E. Vargas Caballero :
>
>> Yeah! Oh, we could have a variable for everything that one could wish
>> to start in st: STTMUX, STGNUSCREEN, STAALIBKDE...
>>
>> or we could just use -e.
>
> Yeah, even when you start it from a menu like dmenu or it is automat
> Yeah! Oh, we could have a variable for everything that one could wish
> to start in st: STTMUX, STGNUSCREEN, STAALIBKDE...
>
> or we could just use -e.
Yeah, even when you start it from a menu like dmenu or it is automatically
spawned from a graphical application. It's true that a boolean varia
On 19/09/2012, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> Maybe a good solution could be
> integrate tmux inside of st (for example if STTMUX is defined, run tmux in
> starup).
Yeah! Oh, we could have a variable for everything that one could wish
to start in st: STTMUX, STGNUSCREEN, STAALIBKDE...
or w
Well... I was asking about comments and suggestion of the patches. I am not
the person who can accept or deny new suggestion, but I am going to give my
personal opinion.
> Would you also port st to wayland?
I think in case of being possible, st is very far to do this, because it has
a lot of thin
Just use 9term.
Quoth Peter Hartman:
> 2012/9/19 pancake :
> > How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer?
>
> We don't want scrollback buffers.
Some of us do.
2012/9/19 pancake :
> How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer?
We don't want scrollback buffers.
--
sic dicit magister P
Université du Québec à Montréal / Loyola University Chicago
http://individual.utoronto.ca/peterjh
gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F5
How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer?
On Sep 19, 2012, at 20:42, "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions.
>
> Best regards.
> <0001-Clear-X-window-in-tsetreset.patch>
> <0002-Remove-unused-parameters-in
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions.
>
> Best regards.
Would you also port st to wayland?
cheers!
mar77i
Hi,
A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions.
Best regards.
>From 703b3cfc0cdb4998abca6815dd32699705a9f912 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:42:48 +0200
Subject: Clear X window in tsetreset()
tsetreset() is c
Some new patches for st.
>From 17025c9ab88bb8560bac3896c2384ad060c6e8d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:03:35 +0200
Subject: Add xcalloc wrapper
malloc and realloc are called through xmalloc and xrealloc, so calloc should
be called through xc
25 matches
Mail list logo
