On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:47:00PM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, ilf wrote:
> > I am running the same tmux session in both rxvt-unicode and st next
> > to each other. The drawing speed of st does indeed feel better than
> > before, but it's still way slower than rx
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> Why can't you set $SHELL?
Stupid restrictions on the environment at work. I telnet into some
silly interface to launch a VNC server; all I can specify is the
window manager executable's path, and it tests to make sure it's a
binary. I guess I
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:22:45AM -0500, Andrew Hills wrote:
> I don't have a choice of setting $SHELL when dwm is launched.
Why can't you set $SHELL?
The SHELL macro from config.h isn't used; instead, the shell is
grabbed with getenv("SHELL"). I guess this was the default behavior
before, but the last time I used st-0.1.1 I didn't mind having bash as
my shell, so I didn't catch it--sorry. The macro should be removed
from config.def.h if it's not
On 8 February 2012 14:17, ilf wrote:
> On 02-08 00:14, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> Care to update the website? http://st.suckless.org/
> And add a post to the News section of http://suckless.org/?
Applied.
> Also, please provide a Tarball-Link and Checksum in the announce mail.
http://dl.suckless
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:47:00PM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> > Last, has anyone managed to adjust the transparency patch to this version?
> > http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1009/6046.html
> > https://gist.github.com/1432900
>
> I don't know. But you can be sure it will trigger another troll-fe
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:41 PM, ilf wrote:
> Using "radeon" driver, but this should be irrelevant, right?
You're not the first one to have performance problem with it [1], I'm afraid :/
1: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Alists.suckless.org+radeon
On 02-08 10:25, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
As Aurélien pointed out, `st` at least behaves similarly (if not
identically). Didn't realize what hg rev I was on on that machine.
Prior test was w/ 187. With current non-xft tip (rev 228), I get
similar results: 0.2s wall time.
st-0.2: 30
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, ilf wrote:
On 02-08 09:39, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
rxvt-unicode uses the wonderful optimization of not really caring
whether everything gets displayed.
I don't know if every one of those output lines is rendered on screen once.
But it doesn't need to, since I can't rea
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Diego Joss wrote:
> there is a minor error on the website in the News section for the
> announcement:
Pushed a fix, waiting for moderation, thanks.
Hi,
there is a minor error on the website in the News section for the
announcement:
http://st.suckles.org";>st 0.2
I think it should be ;-)
http://st.suckless.org";>st 0.2
Have a nice day,
--
Diego Joss
On 02-08 09:39, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
rxvt-unicode uses the wonderful optimization of not really caring
whether everything gets displayed.
I don't know if every one of those output lines is rendered on screen
once. But it doesn't need to, since I can't read it anyways, no matetr
if it ta
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> rxvt-unicode uses the wonderful optimization of not really caring whether
> everything gets displayed. As a test, simulate some command that produces
> output that can't actually be read -- like from a noisy makefile, the
> non-error ou
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, ilf wrote:
> I am running the same tmux session in both rxvt-unicode and st next to each
> other. The drawing speed of st does indeed feel better than before, but it's
> still way slower than rxvt in everything I have tried. This is one of the
> issues still holding
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, ilf wrote:
On 02-08 00:14, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
As I said previously somewhere on the list, I've tagged the last
changeset of the default branch as 0.2.
Checking it out for the first time since 0.1.1.
I am running the same tmux session in both rxvt-unicode and st next to
On 02-08 00:14, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
As I said previously somewhere on the list, I've tagged the last
changeset of the default branch as 0.2.
Checking it out for the first time since 0.1.1.
I am running the same tmux session in both rxvt-unicode and st next to
each other. The drawing speed o
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ilf wrote:
> Care to update the website? http://st.suckless.org/
> And add a post to the News section of http://suckless.org/?
I did but the wiki has moderation.
On 02-08 00:14, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
As I said previously somewhere on the list, I've tagged the last
changeset of the default branch as 0.2.
Thanks!
Care to update the website? http://st.suckless.org/
And add a post to the News section of http://suckless.org/?
Also, please provide a Tarball
Hi all,
As I said previously somewhere on the list, I've tagged the last
changeset of the default branch as 0.2.
19 matches
Mail list logo
