On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:36:01PM +0200, v4hn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 02:17:54PM +0300, Edgaras wrote:
> > Well it seems it does not work for me on raspberry,
> > not that it is a huge loss,
> > as I said I got used to this.
>
> The relevant kernel option is CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 02:17:54PM +0300, Edgaras wrote:
> Well it seems it does not work for me on raspberry,
> not that it is a huge loss,
> as I said I got used to this.
The relevant kernel option is CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK and
by default allocates 64K of RAM for software scrollback.
Mayb
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero said:
> What should we do?
May it be isolated so that it could be enabled/disabled during compilation?
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
> I wouldn't have thought scrollback editing was generally seen as
> useful - why would people want that? Scrollback history files also
> don't sound that interesting.
I always thought the way people use 9term and edit and then re-send
certain commands is great. But the more I used it the clearer
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 02:39:14AM +0300, Otto Modinos wrote:
> You can use shift+{pgup,pgdown} to scroll in the linux tty.
>
Well it seems it does not work for me on raspberry, not that it is a huge loss,
as I said I got used to this.
"Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" wrote:
> It is a complicated point. A lot of people like it a lot, and a lot of
> people hate it a lot, so I don't know what is the next step here. As far as
> I know there are these solutions:
>
> - Ignore the patch
> - create a wiki where publish these kind of patc
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:24:41PM +, Mihail Zenkov wrote:
> Thanks Jochen! This implementation really tiny and useful for many
> people. Maybe we can create st-sb branch for it (like before for utf)
> ?
It is a complicated point. A lot of people like it a lot, and a lot of
people hate it a lo
You can use shift+{pgup,pgdown} to scroll in the linux tty.
Thanks Jochen! This implementation really tiny and useful for many
people. Maybe we can create st-sb branch for it (like before for utf)
?
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 04:08:52PM +0200, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 10/18/13 at 05:01pm, Edgaras wrote:
> > > On 16/10/2013, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > > > I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> > > > for testing and improving first versions.
> > >
>
> > As
On 10/18/13 at 05:01pm, Edgaras wrote:
> > On 16/10/2013, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > > I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> > > for testing and improving first versions.
> >
> As for scrollback in terminal, at first it seemed very annoying as I was uses
> t
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:00:05PM -0500, Strake wrote:
> On 16/10/2013, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> > for testing and improving first versions.
>
> Thanks! This was the last reason against my st adoption.
>
> On 16/10/201
Hi,
thank you for the patch. It works nice! Are you going to add it to
wiki for users which are not subscribed to mailing list?
Branislav Blaškovič
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> for
v4hn said:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:00:05PM -0500, Strake wrote:
> > On 16/10/2013, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > > I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> > > for testing and improving first versions.
> >
> > Thanks! This was the last reason against my st adop
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:00:05PM -0500, Strake wrote:
> On 16/10/2013, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> > for testing and improving first versions.
>
> Thanks! This was the last reason against my st adoption.
This was the sam
> My general rule for where determining where functionality should be placed
> when
> developing stacks is this: where can I implement this functionality that it
> would require the least level of code duplication/reimplementation? I'm pretty
> sure that's at the terminal level in this instance. I
On 16/10/2013, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> for testing and improving first versions.
Thanks! This was the last reason against my st adoption.
On 16/10/2013, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> You can add it as a pat
On 2013-10-16 16:15, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> You can add it as a patch to the wiki but it won’t be included in main‐
> line. Scrollback is what you have other applications for. Because next you
> will want scrollback selection, scrollback editing and scrollback history
> files. Other people
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:15:08PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:15:08 +0200 Jochen Sprickerhof
> wrote:
> > I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> > for testing and improving first versions.
>
> You can add it as a patch to the wiki b
Greetings.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:15:08 +0200 Jochen Sprickerhof
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> for testing and improving first versions.
You can add it as a patch to the wiki but it won’t be included in main‐
line. Scrollback is what
Quoth Jochen Sprickerhof:
> I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
> for testing and improving first versions.
Awesome, that sounds great! I don't have time to test it at present,
but will do so when I can.
Thanks Jochen :)
Hi,
I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn
for testing and improving first versions.
Cheers Jochen
>From 8bae501586ed77a624170937c8bd53433f64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jochen Sprickerhof
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:35:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add scrollback
22 matches
Mail list logo
