On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:35:55 -0700
Wolf Tivy wrote:
> Ok, it works if I make the port 6667, which is also not in my /etc/services.
> Should port just be 6667 instead of mucking around with symbolic port
> resolution?
Yes.
Robert Ransom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ok, it works if I make the port 6667, which is also not in my /etc/services.
Should port just be 6667 instead of mucking around with symbolic port
resolution?
- Original Message -
From: Wolf Tivy
Date: Saturday, October 9, 2010 9:27 pm
Subject: [dev] [sic][patch] fixes and questions.
To
Hello!
some fixes for sic attached. story below.
sic was saying "error: cannot resolve hostname : Success" so I
went to the source.
The Success was because the code was written assuming the failure would set
errno, but it didn't.
I fixed it to print out the right error message, but make wouldn't
