> having external programs link against libutil.a is a PITA because musl/glibc
> also have a libutil.a in the library directory. IMHO the name could be changed
> to something less general.
If you have musl/glibc libutil.a in sbase directory, you've got a real
problem indeed, but unrelated to this
Hi,
having external programs link against libutil.a is a PITA because musl/glibc
also have a libutil.a in the library directory. IMHO the name could be changed
to something less general.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:12:43PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:18:43PM +0300, A
I was thinking it maybe has a generic name and could be splitted in
smaller, more specific, libraries?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:14 PM Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:18:43PM +0300, Adrian Grigore wrote:
> > Is there any interest in splitting llibutil from sbase in smaller l
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:18:43PM +0300, Adrian Grigore wrote:
> Is there any interest in splitting llibutil from sbase in smaller libraries?
> --
> Thanks,
> Adi
>
No, why?
--
Kind regards,
Hiltjo
Is there any interest in splitting llibutil from sbase in smaller libraries?
--
Thanks,
Adi
