* Galos, David [2013-06-14 22:39:12 -0500]:
> > Or are you limiting this to pure ansi instead of posix?
> I'm just trying to conform with the rest of sbase. The CFLAGS include
> `-ansi -pedantic -Wall` and I don't want my code to compile with
> warnings.
>
you can get rid of the warning in stric
> Or are you limiting this to pure ansi instead of posix?
I'm just trying to conform with the rest of sbase. The CFLAGS include
`-ansi -pedantic -Wall` and I don't want my code to compile with
warnings.
> How exactly do you think you are going to be able to work with / create
> files larger than w
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 13:35, Galos, David wrote:
> In my implementation of split, the ability to split files into rather
> large chunks is important. However, c89 does not provide a 64-bit int
> type by default. Although I could manually emulate 64-bit counting, a
> uvlong would be far cleaner.
* Galos, David [2013-06-11 13:10:37 -0500]:
> Right, but '-ansi -pedantic' is strictly C89. GCC doesn't complain,
> but I could imagine there being trepidation around using a C99 header
> in a C89 environment (where it is not required).
>
> 2013/6/11 Thorsten Glaser :
> > Galos, David dixit:
> >
Interesting mix of top- and bottom-posting. I'll not disturb it.
Anyway, 1999 was 14 years ago. I think uint64_t is the least of our
worries if we're porting to some exotic architecture where gcc can't at
least emulate a 64-bit integer. I mean even tcc has a runtime library
for that.
On Tue, Jun
Right, but '-ansi -pedantic' is strictly C89. GCC doesn't complain,
but I could imagine there being trepidation around using a C99 header
in a C89 environment (where it is not required).
2013/6/11 Thorsten Glaser :
> Galos, David dixit:
>
>>On GNU systems stdint.h still provides uint64_t, but I ha
Galos, David dixit:
>On GNU systems stdint.h still provides uint64_t, but I have no idea
>how portable this is.
is C99.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
17:08⎜«Vutral» früher gabs keine packenden smartphones und so
17:08⎜«Vutral» heute gibts frauen die sind facebooksüchtig
17:10⎜«Vutral» aber auch traurig;
In my implementation of split, the ability to split files into rather
large chunks is important. However, c89 does not provide a 64-bit int
type by default. Although I could manually emulate 64-bit counting, a
uvlong would be far cleaner. Is there a suckless-approved way of using
such an integer in
