On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:38:18PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
To be honest I'm surprised there's such a reaction to something so
trivial as an added keybind. I'm glad this doesn't happen often or
we'd never get anything done.
We just like to argue. I honestly don't even care: I don't use
Connor Lane Smith writes:
> To be honest I'm surprised there's such a reaction to something so
> trivial as an added keybind. I'm glad this doesn't happen often or
> we'd never get anything done.
Well, you can only paint a bike shed every so often.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
On 9 August 2010 23:38, TJ Robotham wrote:
> Actually, it is an emacsism insomuch as bash's manpage specifically describes
> the default line editing commands as emacs-style, in contrast to a vi-style
> that
> can be enabled in its place.
Sorry, I suppose I expected better than that even from ba
On 9 August 2010 23:38, TJ Robotham wrote:
> Actually, it is an emacsism insomuch as bash's manpage specifically describes
> the default line editing commands as emacs-style, in contrast to a vi-style
> that
> can be enabled in its place.
Sorry, I suppose I expected better than that even from ba
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
On 8 August 2010 09:22, Uriel wrote:
Both are emacsisms as far as I can tell, and of little use (specialy
given ^C already aborts).
^D isn't an emacsism insofar as using it in bash when not at the end
of the line works the sam
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:38:35PM -0400, TJ Robotham wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> > ^D isn't an emacsism insofar as using it in bash when not at the end
> > of the line works the same way. That said, I'm aware bash is a
> > monster. However:
>
> Ac
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> ^D isn't an emacsism insofar as using it in bash when not at the end
> of the line works the same way. That said, I'm aware bash is a
> monster. However:
Actually, it is an emacsism insomuch as bash's manpage specifically describ
On 9 August 2010 13:35, Uriel wrote:
> This is a totally retarded argument, Plan 9 terminals do have a
> cursor, and certainly don't implement every retarded stupid keybinding
> imaginable, specially not ones that conflict with one of the most
> generally accepted and used keybindings.
They also
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 8 August 2010 09:22, Uriel wrote:
>> Both are emacsisms as far as I can tell, and of little use (specialy
>> given ^C already aborts).
>
> ^D isn't an emacsism insofar as using it in bash when not at the end
> of the line work
Hey,
On 8 August 2010 09:22, Uriel wrote:
> Both are emacsisms as far as I can tell, and of little use (specialy
> given ^C already aborts).
^D isn't an emacsism insofar as using it in bash when not at the end
of the line works the same way. That said, I'm aware bash is a
monster. However:
On 8
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:22:05AM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote:
This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to d
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:22:05AM +0200, Uriel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
Hey,
On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote:
This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These keys are
also used in programs like bash or Emacs.
I've added C-d but
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote:
>> This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These keys are
>> also used in programs like bash or Emacs.
>
> I've added C-d but not C-g, since it seems like an emacsism.
Bot
On 06/08/2010, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> AFAIR C-g just emits BEL by default in bash (as it used in most old
> terminals), but yeah, it's probably good to have it, thx.
dmenu already has C-c to abort, btw.
cls
Daniel Clemente dixit (2010-08-06, 03:08):
> This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These
> keys are also used in programs like bash or Emacs.
AFAIR C-g just emits BEL by default in bash (as it used in most old
terminals), but yeah, it's probably good to have it, thx.
--
[a]
Hey,
On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote:
> This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These keys are
> also used in programs like bash or Emacs.
I've added C-d but not C-g, since it seems like an emacsism.
Thanks,
cls
This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These keys are also
used in programs like bash or Emacs.
I think this completes the C-something keyboard shortcuts set.
-- Daniel
diff -r 8e019362118b dmenu.c
--- a/dmenu.c Thu Aug 05 15:41:56 2010 +0100
+++ b/dmenu.c Fri Aug 06 11
17 matches
Mail list logo
