* Connor Lane Smith [2010-10-01 17:14]:
> On 30 September 2010 10:49, wrote:
> > The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unicode and works for
> > me.
>
> I'm not sure what to do here, since the font you specified is in fact
> different, and I doubt it's standard.
It is different
Hey,
On 30 September 2010 10:49, wrote:
> The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unicode and works for
> me.
I'm not sure what to do here, since the font you specified is in fact
different, and I doubt it's standard. Keeping it as "fixed" seems the
safest for now; it's unicode-aw
I have elided human, haven't read Asimov for years...
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:19 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Well, human readable XML is what you should patent, but I guess Jordi
> forgot that part in rage...
>
> When I think about it you could use blocks of XML to create letters,
Well, human readable XML is what you should patent, but I guess Jordi
forgot that part in rage...
When I think about it you could use blocks of XML to create letters,
like ascii art.
Eventually you would really have human readable XML!
On 9/30/10, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> * Jordi Marine
* Jordi Marine [2010-09-30 15:08]:
> readable XML?
Valid statement.
He didn't say human readable.
as readable as tar.gz is.
> You must patent it.
--
stanio_
readable XML?
You must patent it.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
>
> > Maybe you should switch to a suckless language that doesn't require
> > several megs of font data.
> Maybe dwm should be rewritten to use GTK instead of xlib, and also include a
> nice, human readable
* Anders Andersson [2010-09-30 13:55]:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, anonymous wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:49:52AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> Maybe you should switch to a suckless language that doesn't require
> several megs of font data.
Please suggest a country I sho
> Maybe you should switch to a suckless language that doesn't require
> several megs of font data.
Maybe dwm should be rewritten to use GTK instead of xlib, and also include a
nice, human readable XML config file?
Hey,
* Connor Lane Smith [2010-09-30 11:58]:
> Hey,
>
> On 30 September 2010 10:49, wrote:
> > I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
> > with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
> >
> > The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unico
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, anonymous wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:49:52AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
>> with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
>>
>> The attached tiny patch
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:49:52AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
> with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
>
> The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unicode and works for
> me.
Hey,
On 30 September 2010 10:49, wrote:
> I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
> with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
>
> The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unicode and works for
> me.
Interesting, the default font "fixed"
Hi,
I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unicode and works for
me.
cheers,
--
stanio_
diff -r 91fdc4ef4afc font.c
--- a/font.cSat Sep 11 13:35:1
13 matches
Mail list logo
