On 05/10/2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>Yes, sorry, I missed that it bound to IPv4 alone by default. Should
>>work now. Thanks.
>
> Nope – maybe it’s firewalled (looks like pf block drop)?
>
> tg@blau:~ $ nc -v6 starchlinux.org 80
> nc: connect to starchlinux.org port 80 (tcp) failed: Operation ti
Strake dixit:
>> “HTTP/1.1 200 Schön”?!
>
>What, is this improper usage?
No, just funny.
>Yes, sorry, I missed that it bound to IPv4 alone by default. Should
>work now. Thanks.
Nope – maybe it’s firewalled (looks like pf block drop)?
tg@blau:~ $ nc -v6 starchlinux.org 80
nc: connect to starchl
On 05/10/2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Strake dixit:
>
>>http://starchlinux.org/
>
> “HTTP/1.1 200 Schön”?!
What, is this improper usage?
> One rather important thing: starchlinux.org has got an RR
> but the httpd does not listen on IP, only on Legacy IP. Please
> fix that, because otherwi
Strake dixit:
>http://starchlinux.org/
“HTTP/1.1 200 Schön”?!
One rather important thing: starchlinux.org has got an RR
but the httpd does not listen on IP, only on Legacy IP. Please
fix that, because otherwise, a good part of the ’net can’t ac‐
cess your site.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[ Natur
I posted about Starch earlier [1]; to remind, it's static-linked
Arch-based Linux distro built against musl. The basic system now works
with a few small glitches. So far, packages for x86_64 are available.
http://starchlinux.org/
[1] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1210/13050.html
