On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Marc Collin wrote:
> Isn't /rocks and /other_projects redundant?
> I mean, software listed on /other_projects rocks and software on
> /rocks are other projects.
>
>
Projects that can be associated suckless or suckless developers in one
way or another might fall i
Isn't /rocks and /other_projects redundant?
I mean, software listed on /other_projects rocks and software on
/rocks are other projects.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:26:27 +0100 Greg Reagle wrote:
>> On 01/09/201
Greetings.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:26:27 +0100 Greg Reagle wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 02:18 PM, Charles Lehner wrote:
> > This patch makes surf reload its pages when it receives a SIGHUP
> > signal. This makes it easier for shell scripts to trigger surf to
> > reload.
>
> Excellent. This makes it po
On 01/09/2016 02:18 PM, Charles Lehner wrote:
This patch makes surf reload its pages when it receives a SIGHUP
signal. This makes it easier for shell scripts to trigger surf to
reload.
Excellent. This makes it possible to use it with entr without killing
and restarting.
Fellow hackers, should
Greetings.
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 21:14:50 +0100 Charles Lehner wrote:
> This patch makes surf reload its pages when it receives a SIGHUP signal. This
> makes it easier for shell scripts to trigger surf to reload.
>
> I'm aware of using xdotool to trigger ctrl+r keypresses for reloading [1] but
>
This patch makes surf reload its pages when it receives a SIGHUP signal. This
makes it easier for shell scripts to trigger surf to reload.
I'm aware of using xdotool to trigger ctrl+r keypresses for reloading [1] but I
wasn't able to get that to work in a general way.
I'm sending this here in c
