Re: [dev] [PATCH] Refactor the mainloop

2014-07-08 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 24 June 2014 23:52, Anders Eurenius wrote: > Refactor the mainloop > > Try to separate the different concerns of the main loop into separate, > simpler functions. I think it's a useful step, but I also think that > more should be done. Btw. it would really help to put st in the

Re: [dev] [PATCH] Refactor the mainloop

2014-07-08 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> I am going to apply the patch of FRIGN about monotonic clock before > your patch, , that conflict with your changes. If you can rebase > this patch with that patch could be great (I hope I could push the > patch of FRIGN soon). And, please be careful with the style ;). St No answer to this requi

Re: [dev] [PATCH] Refactor the mainloop

2014-06-25 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
I think this is a first step in order to improve the code of the main loop, because it will make the loop more understable. I think in the final implementation of the main loop we shouldn't need this separation, because it should be enough simple and clear that spliting it in functions shouldn't be

[dev] [PATCH] Refactor the mainloop

2014-06-24 Thread Anders Eurenius
Refactor the mainloop Try to separate the different concerns of the main loop into separate, simpler functions. I think it's a useful step, but I also think that more should be done. cheers aes From 015e8b45b18690d81e2505309753efaa8af9799d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anders Eu