On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:09:13PM +0200, pancake wrote:
We should move this thread to Twitter.
I'd sooner throw away my computer than sign up for a Twitter
account.
--
Kris Maglione
About the use of language: it is impossible to sharpen a pencil with a
blunt axe. It is equally vain to try
On 06/11/10 14:05, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:51:43PM +0200, pancake wrote:
I would love to have such lib usable for more than one kernel (w32,
bsd, osx, linux..)
this is theorically the big benefit of glibc.. but it is certainly
something i would love
to have..
NetBSD
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:51:43PM +0200, pancake wrote:
I would love to have such lib usable for more than one kernel (w32, bsd,
osx, linux..)
this is theorically the big benefit of glibc.. but it is certainly
something i would love
to have..
NetBSD have a good Libc implementation, but it i
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> Do we have feature-complete alternatives to GNU libc?
> eglibc is not an option, since it's based solely on the point that Drepper is
> an asshole.
> From what I heard, uClibc is incomplete, as is klibc and dietlibc..
> What else do we have
I would love to have such lib usable for more than one kernel (w32, bsd,
osx, linux..)
this is theorically the big benefit of glibc.. but it is certainly
something i would love
to have..
NetBSD have a good Libc implementation, but it is not suckless.. I would
certainly
like to see something li
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:02:02PM +0200, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
Do we have feature-complete alternatives to GNU libc?
eglibc is not an option, since it's based solely on the point that Drepper is
an asshole.
Drepper is an asshole. That's as good a reason as any.
From what I heard, uClibc is
Do we have feature-complete alternatives to GNU libc?
eglibc is not an option, since it's based solely on the point that Drepper is
an asshole.
>From what I heard, uClibc is incomplete, as is klibc and dietlibc..
What else do we have? Android libc? How many programs depend on glibc?
