(replying to Laslo)
> which is basically a CGI-interface and thus not within quark's scope.
thttpd has a patch that adds basic CGI support, and I've quickly scanned the
patch, and it seems super simple.. perhaps you could use that in one way or
another.
I don't mean to say "support intellectual pr
Hey, Laslo.
Yeah, that's fine.. it's like "stable release" for normies.
Ah. I kind-of like Quark.. I don't want to go try thttpd..
It does NOT work XD
In fact - it seems to work much less.. like the opposite from before.
I get like the IP (localhost) dropped - -
usually it's IP (localhost) 200(o
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 14:02:48 +0100
Thomas Oltmann wrote:
Dear Thomas,
> Looks to me like your version of quark is actually a lot newer than
> 2020; Old versions of quark did not print that "dropped" message.
>
> Probably only tangentially related,
> but I reported a bug in the connection droppi
If you guys want - perhaps we can play the printf game, or rather - the
logging game?
Ah, I see.
I forgot how to use git after such a long absence from programming.. +6
months.
I ran the command and it's up to date, last commit is
68b4f733b2755762e43df90f73db5a6ec8d14104 on both of my sites.
I see.
I can test the patch, but I don't think I'm using AF_INET6 as I disabled IPv6
in Fr
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 3:53 PM wrote:
>
> I did a git clone like it says on the main Quark web-site, and doing `mandoc
> -a quark.1` it shows '2020-09-27', and that's what I am using.
> Unless that's wrong and/or there's another way to get the version number -
> I'd
> like to know.
Ah i see. Run
I did a git clone like it says on the main Quark web-site, and doing `mandoc
-a quark.1` it shows '2020-09-27', and that's what I am using.
Unless that's wrong and/or there's another way to get the version number -
I'd
like to know.
> which meant that quark would likely drop legitimate connections
> Reread Laslo's message and look at the source code as he suggested in
the mentioned message.
I cannot afford that, I have health problems :(.
Regardless - I am getting only ~5 requests per minute, and my biggest file
is <3M, so even given the attack has a super-slow Tor circuit connection
of say
Hi fossy,
Looks to me like your version of quark is actually a lot newer than 2020;
Old versions of quark did not print that "dropped" message.
Probably only tangentially related,
but I reported a bug in the connection dropping code some time ago,
which meant that quark would likely drop legitimat
On 23/02/25 12:59PM, fo...@dnmx.org wrote:
> Tried -s 128 -t 8, doesn't seem to do jack shit..
> Got less than 10 connection logs from Quark and then another dropped one..
> Is there any other reason Quark would print-out 'dropped', other than
> connection pool at max?
>
> I restarted the jail, so
Tried -s 128 -t 8, doesn't seem to do jack shit..
Got less than 10 connection logs from Quark and then another dropped one..
Is there any other reason Quark would print-out 'dropped', other than
connection pool at max?
I restarted the jail, so Quark's memory and stuff should have been reset.
Hey, I just read the quark.1 .
I see the -s and -t options lol. I shall experiment.
Hi, Laslo.
Sorry, I might not have been best at explaining problem, but then again - I
didn't quite understand problem.. but said all I did understand.
> one of my development goals for quark was to have no memory allocations at
runtime.
Right, I knew that.. but what about memory allocation BEFOR
You are a brainless joke.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 09:50:42AM -0500, fo...@dnmx.org wrote:
> Hello.
> Before I start, I want to clarify 2 things:
> 1. I'm not 100% sure if it's a Quark problem, but there are like 2/4th
> chance that it is.
> 2. I'm hosting my site over the Tor network
>
> Problem I have: software runs, can
Hello.
Before I start, I want to clarify 2 things:
1. I'm not 100% sure if it's a Quark problem, but there are like 2/4th
chance that it is.
2. I'm hosting my site over the Tor network
Problem I have: software runs, can access it from localhost via curl, but
cannot access it from Tor
What happens
16 matches
Mail list logo
