On 26 February 2015 at 15:59, Marc André Tanner wrote:
>
> Please provide feedback whether this works as expected.
LGTM
> Thanks
Thanks to you!
--
- yiyus || JGL .
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:07:50AM +0100, yy wrote:
> On 26 February 2015 at 07:18, David Phillips wrote:
> > Being the author of the initial patch, Marc has reminded me to submit
> > any feedback I have on the abduco_force patch, which will supersede my
> > contribution. I did initially think of
On 26 February 2015 at 07:18, David Phillips wrote:
> Being the author of the initial patch, Marc has reminded me to submit
> any feedback I have on the abduco_force patch, which will supersede my
> contribution. I did initially think of using a -f option, but didn't
> think there would be a need
Being the author of the initial patch, Marc has reminded me to submit
any feedback I have on the abduco_force patch, which will supersede my
contribution. I did initially think of using a -f option, but didn't
think there would be a need for any other option to be forced. This is
how I ended up usi
I have attached two patches for discussion:
- abduco_default.diff: run a default action when no flag is given
('A', but configurable in config.h)
- abduco_force.diff: remove -C mode, in favour of a -f flag that works
with -c, -n or -A, which forces the creation of a new session when
there is an e
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:20:47PM +0100, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce version 0.3 of abduco, a tool for session
> {at,de}tach support which allows to run a process independently from
> its controlling terminal. In combination with dvtm it is a lightweight
> alternati
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce version 0.3 of abduco, a tool for session
{at,de}tach support which allows to run a process independently from
its controlling terminal. In combination with dvtm it is a lightweight
alternative to tmux and screen.
http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/abduco/abduco-0.3.t
