On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 06:26:55PM +0200, Sebastian Liem wrote:
diff -r 09af6227574f ed/ed.c
--- a/ed/ed.c Fri Jun 04 11:44:25 2010 +0100
+++ b/ed/ed.c Sun Jul 18 17:35:53 2010 +0200
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
voidsetwide(void);
voidsqueeze(int);
voidsubstitute(int);
-char* _mktemp(char
On 19 July 2010 16:15, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:48:13AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch. I'll apply it. It might be down to the fact that
>> lib9 in 9base is quite old and some changes that made it into p9p
>> didn't make it into 9base yet.
>
> Would y
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:48:13AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On 18 July 2010 17:26, Sebastian Liem wrote:
ehlo,
I had to do some changes to successfully build 9base on
OpenBSD-current.
Changes
a. include in lib9/_p9dir.c (already done in plan9port)
b. s/_mktemp/__mktemp/
Hi Sebastian,
On 18 July 2010 17:26, Sebastian Liem wrote:
>
> ehlo,
>
> I had to do some changes to successfully build 9base on
> OpenBSD-current.
>
> Changes
> a. include in lib9/_p9dir.c (already done in plan9port)
> b. s/_mktemp/__mktemp/g in ed/ed.c due clashing with libc (iirc)
>
> Patch
ehlo,
I had to do some changes to successfully build 9base on
OpenBSD-current.
Changes
a. include in lib9/_p9dir.c (already done in plan9port)
b. s/_mktemp/__mktemp/g in ed/ed.c due clashing with libc (iirc)
Patch included.
diff -r 09af6227574f ed/ed.c
--- a/ed/ed.c Fri Jun 04 11:44:25 2010
