On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 12:15:18PM +, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> At the end of the day, a bug is a bug irrespective of how it was introduced.
>
> I will have a look at the patch tomorrow.
My opinion is that all the code imported should be removed and
written in house.
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 12:52:31PM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:21:05 +0100
> isabella parakiss wrote:
>
> Hey Isabella,
>
> > i've been told on #2f30 that my opinion is void until i submit meaningful
> > patches. this is a rant^Wbreakdown and fix of a random tool in ubase
>
>
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:21:05 +0100
isabella parakiss wrote:
Hey Isabella,
> i've been told on #2f30 that my opinion is void until i submit meaningful
> patches. this is a rant^Wbreakdown and fix of a random tool in ubase
I'll look deeper into this later, but I want to note here that back in th
i've been told on #2f30 that my opinion is void until i submit meaningful
patches. this is a rant^Wbreakdown and fix of a random tool in ubase
$ echo abcd | dd bs=1 count=1 skip=1 2>/dev/null # any other dd
b
$ echo abcd | ubase dd bs=1 count=1 skip=1 quiet; echo $?
dd: copy: Success
22
"wtf i
