Re: [dev] trying to debug dvtm: fuzz testing?

2021-06-20 Thread opal hart
On Thu, 20 May 2021 13:04:08 -0400 "Greg Reagle" wrote: > I have used dvtm in the past but gave up because of crashes that were > unpredictable. I know C and I have recently learned a bit more about > gdb and core dumps and debugging Enable coredumps (`ulimit -c unlimited` works for the current

Re: [dev] [st] Thoughts on kitty keyboard protocol

2021-06-20 Thread opal hart
On Sat, 22 May 2021 15:10:02 +0200 Страхиња Радић wrote: > Speaking as (thus far) just a user of suckless programs and someone who > supports > suckless philosophy, it comes down to: why should this protocol be supported? > There isn't a significant number of existing suckless programs that need

Re: [dev] dmenu transparent background

2019-05-06 Thread opal hart
On Sun, 5 May 2019 21:38:44 +0200 Johan Björnehäll wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to use transparent background (see through/other > windows behind) with dmenu? You might have luck repurposing st's alpha patch [1] for dmenu [1] -- wowaname

[dev] Mailing list searching

2019-05-06 Thread opal hart
On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:13:32 +0200 Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 02:34:28AM +0000, opal hart wrote: > > Shouldn't this be a FAQ entry at this point for any suckless projects > > depending on Xft? > > If only we could teach people to read... >

Re: [dev] [st][bug] Crashes on opening mutt

2019-05-05 Thread opal hart
On Fri, 3 May 2019 15:01:02 +0200 Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > It is not a st bug. See the previous bug reports (color emojis) on this > mailinglist for more information. > Shouldn't this be a FAQ entry at this point for any suckless projects depending on Xft? -- wowaname

Re: [dev] Preprocessor

2019-04-24 Thread opal hart
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:26:04 -0400 Cág wrote: > http://porkmail.org/era/unix/award.html `ls | cat` is actually useful to combat the differences between implementations of ls(1) and ensure a one-column, uncoloured list -- wowaname

Re: [dev] [st] bug?

2019-04-21 Thread opal hart
> > st uses xft font and xft is known to crash with color emoji. > > And so how to fix this? > This was discussed at length many times before on this ML; I suggest checking the online archives: https://duckduckgo.com/html/?q=site:lists.suckless.org+xft+emoji -- wowaname

Re: [dev] Re: [slock] Need help working on the project

2019-04-14 Thread opal hart
> I don't know if I am allowed to reply to this email I don't see why you wouldn't be allowed. > The executable, slock, needs suid of root to be run. That's why I > can't just put a `sudo` before `./slock` and run the program. If I do, > then I get "Make sure to suid or sgid slock." So, I change

[dev] HSTS issues on suckless.org

2019-03-22 Thread opal hart
> wmii.suckless.org uses an invalid security certificate. The > certificate is only valid for the following names: core.suckless.org, > dl.suckless.org, dwm.suckless.org, ev.suckless.org, git.suckless.org, > gunther.suckless.org, libs.suckless.org, lists.suckless.org, > mx.suckless.org, oldgit.suck

Re: [dev] [st] solarized light patch colors incorrect

2018-09-07 Thread opal hart
On September 7, 2018 9:34:44 PM UTC, "Cág" wrote: > I am currently LOL'ing @ the thread. > > It ain't no CVE, it's a freakin color scheme crap. Found a bug -> fix > the damn thing. Don't need no MS in CS. > > -- > caóc Look at any other dev project and you'll see that this is a childish display

Re: [dev] [st] solarized light patch colors incorrect

2018-09-07 Thread opal hart
> Maybe it's a misplaced consumer^Wgrown up habbit which makes you feel > like your entitled to a comment? It's called making conversation > If you had the decency to at least read the answers to the questions > for which you demand an answer, you'd had seen I already did. Oh yes: > I would reply

Re: [dev] [st] solarized light patch colors incorrect

2018-09-07 Thread opal hart
So, back to that question about security-related bug reports. You haven't commented. -- wowaname Please use detailed subject lines and reply below quoted text whenever possible.

Re: [dev] [st] solarized light patch colors incorrect

2018-09-07 Thread opal hart
> Third‐party patches are what they are. If you don't read and/or > understand what you apply, you're on your own. "We don't support third-party patches, fix it yourself or contact the person who developed the patch." That wasn't hard to say. It's your role to make not only the code, but also th

Re: [dev] [st] solarized light patch colors incorrect

2018-09-07 Thread opal hart
On September 7, 2018 2:59:56 PM UTC, Quentin Rameau wrote: > > My sole intent was to report a bug, leaving it up to you how you > handle it. > > Thank you consumer, please forward to your nearest Apple Store > Geniuses And you would reply the same way to a security-related bug report without a

[dev] [meta] ML archive for download?

2018-08-07 Thread opal hart
Hi, Are the suckless mailing list archives available in an importable mbox format? I don't see such a functionality exposed on the web archives, nor am I sure what software is being used to produce the archives. -- wowaname Please use detailed subject lines and reply belo

Re: [dev] [st] Hardcoded colors. Can I change them runtime?

2018-08-01 Thread opal hart
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 21:33:50 +0200 Timur Fayzrakhmanov wrote: > Something like printf "\\e]P%x%s" where %x is color index > and %s is RGB color. As I observed it's kind of "standard" way of > applying color schemes. I see. `OSC P` only works for the Linux VT, so it isn't standard as you describe.

Re: [dev] [st] Hardcoded colors. Can I change them runtime?

2018-07-30 Thread opal hart
Either copy config.def.h to config.h and edit that, or use . -- wowaname Please use detailed subject lines and reply below quoted text whenever possible.