Hi Laslo and Anselm,
Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:07:47 -0700
> Anselm Garbe wrote:
> > Thanks for doing that and letting me know. So the reason you see this
> > performance penalty in contrast to the other web servers you mention
> > is, that quark is a fork() based web server
Hi,
I'm toying with quark and noticed it's comparatively poor performance in
my use case. I used Apache bench to benchmark the web server. With this
setup I got 980 requests/second:
echo 'foo bar' > index.html
doas quark -d . -h localhost -p 8080 > /dev/null &
ab -n 1 -c 20 'http://localhost:8
