> ...and this is precisely the garden path that people followed to create
> modern massive web frameworks.
indeed. Merb, when it began, was a 180 line of code masterpiece. somehow, it
bloated up to Rails proportions and eventually merged with it.
Camping is decent, but i found it uneditable (w
http://i.imgur.com/I2lJa.png
http://gitorious.org/element/element/blobs/master/ruby/W/mail.rb
i'm pretty happy with this - if you have feature suggestions or questions mail
me offlist
ive been working on one for a while, 'element' on gitorious/rubyforge/repo.or.cz
1461 lines of ruby if sloccount is accurate. includesa full Filesystem-backed
key/value/triple-store with range query and web-arch complaint API. using it as
a mail app as well, screenshot:
http://i574.photobucket.
> Also, I would like to know, what do people on this list feel about type
> checking in general?
a fan, definitely. if i gave a damn about customizing my WM i'd use xmonad. but
stock dwm is fine..
> Again, uzbl and surf developers are *not* 'browser programmers', they
> are not writing any browsers, they are painting a very thin coat of
> paint over existing turd browsers out there.
why give up history autocompletion and go back to the dark ages of .ini file
editing ?
its the same turd in
> > what would be most effective in tracking
> > down the inevitable problems when there's a bug in the user input
> > and/or mismatched input, particularly if it happens in the middle of a
> > pipe process: how are you going to report which part of the input
i'm liking Parsec (
http://research.m
> whatever they do (whether WM-in-browser or hide-browser-in-WM) it will
> both be tailored for HTML/XML/Javascript UI widget technology and will
yeah. like WebOS(Palm), WebKit -> FBdev, but with Chrome vs WebKit
> So I'm not thinking it'll be challenging X in "personal usability" for
> those use
On Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 09:53:57AM +0200, yy wrote:
> 2009/7/3 Alex Matviychuk :
> > Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
> > pick up most of the ads adblock targets.
> >
>
> Actually, a good private proxy with greasemonkey support would be
> really useful for me.
> Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
> pick up most of the ads adblock targets.
disabling JS and using an /etc/hosts file like http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > On 7/3/09, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> >>
10 matches
Mail list logo
