Re: [dev] [sbase] printf(1)

be largely > equivalent. > I have the feeling that I forgot to mention something, but, well, it > probably will come up again. Anyways I hope you like it. > > Best regards, > Maurice Quennet People on this list need to learn about 'git format-patch' and 'git send-email'... -- William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/ GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF pgp7WKAm13S8G.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:20:29AM +0400, Alexander S. wrote: > 2013/10/24 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com>: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:35:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >> Mihail Zenkov dixit: > >> > >> >It not mention good xml alter

Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML

hey're not just used in Windows, they're used in many other places that require simple, easy to use configurations. Python uses it, there are C api's for it, etc. So what problem do you have with a .ini file? Thanks, -- William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/ GnuPG Key:

Re: [dev] [sbase] built with watcom

me poettering’d and UsrMove’d > yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-) I can understand why this crowd is afraid of systemd, but being afraid of the /usr move stuff just baffles me. Is there some reason not to do this? Thanks, -- William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/ GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF

Re: [dev] suckless dotfiles approach

hardlinked and dirs - ie. ~/.vim/ - > are created. Binary files are copied. There is no automagical adding of > dotfiles to the repo. -- William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/ GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF pgpVFtvcRgFc1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] Call for configurations

dmenu/st/surf/etc. Idea: make master non-world-writable, and have users push named branches to the repo. Just a thought. -- William Giokas | KaiSforza GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF pgpiuRHbmrjtc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] [dmenu] What is the status of the project?

k applied. > > > http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1304/15300.html > > Ok, applied, but in a slightly amended version. You forgot to add the config.def.h to git. -- William Giokas | KaiSforza GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF pgpazbj5meRls.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] ii IPv6 support

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 02:55:08PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> [2013-04-12 03:35]: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:25:25AM +0800, Patrick Haller wrote: > > > On 2013-04-11 21:17, Carlos Torres wrote: > > > > it was

Re: [dev] ii IPv6 support

a multitude of other branches for different patches with one that I selectively merge to called 'patched' that I use for building. There's no reason to keep patches as patch files in git. Thanks, -- William Giokas | KaiSforza GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8

Re: [dev] Call for pkgsrc users

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:44:34PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Greetings. > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:34 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > > > The »basic core« shouldn’t

Re: [dev] Call for pkgsrc users

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Greetings. > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:59:18 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > > > Greetings comrades, > >

Re: [dev] Call for pkgsrc users

e. Might I ask what principle they're not keeping to? > So a call to all Linux users of pkgsrc: > How are you using pkgsrc and how do you install a new system with just > pkgsrc? -- William Giokas | KaiSforza GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8

Re: [dev] Re: [slcon] Call for Papers 2013

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 06:34:00AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Greetings. > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:34:00 +0100 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:53:47PM -0500, Strake wrote: > > > On 23/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com

Re: [dev] Re: [slcon] Call for Papers 2013

* can't easily start non-root user services > You missed the best part: * socket activation -- William Giokas | KaiSforza GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF pgpRUOus4s_TH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] [surf] introduce .gitignore

ile list it’s not adding any > advantage for anyone. That’s why .gitignore is not added. You do realize that there are .hgtags files in most, if not all, of your repositories? What are those doing there but adding extra complexity? Just thought I'd bring that up, while we're going on a

Re: [dev] surf man page

t; 70c70 > < Scroll up one whole page view. > --- > > Scrolls up one page. > 73c73 > < Scroll down one whole page view. > --- > > Scrolls down one page. > 76c76 > < Scroll horizontally to the right. > --- > > Scrolls to the right. > 79c79 > &

Re: [dev] [PATCH] st: Use ascent + descent for font height to avoid clipping underscores.

s comment. If there would be a > > comment about all wrong behaviour of xft and how bad the fontconfig API > > is, st would double its raw source size. > > When you send a git patch, you can put a message under the `---` but above the diffstat and it'll not be included when y