> Holy shit. Is everyone on here a fucking child trying to score points about
> something that really doesn't matter? People like you are the reason why
> Usenet died.
>
> Grow up.
>
> If you want to know how to deal with something like an adult:
He said, resurrecting shit that had already fizzl
> We are really glad to know you've been entertained.
I think you mean "I am really glad".
> this would have been more constructive to address directly Thomas to ask
> about his needs if you're interested at all in this discussion.
It sounds like you want to have a discussion about how to do th
> Like trolling on mailing lists, thank you.
Unlike the OP's four paragraph feature request against software which
suckless obviously doesn't offer, I have at least found isabella's content
entertaining and concise.
While I'm sure it was kind of you to step in to defend your bro, I would
have pre
> what do you use to communicate with the part of the world (a majority,
> unfortunately) who uses suckish formats such as .doc(x), .od[tspg] or
> whatever? If Office is bloated, LibreOffice ain't slim, and people
> keep sending me word documents :/
When people send me word documents, I have my ma
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:48:05AM +0200, hadrien.lac...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> I'd say cwm instead of evilwm. When I had to use an ant screen laptop, it was
> pretty nice. The only thing I lacked is workspaces.
Ah, someone who knows how to have a discussion, how lovely! :D
~ Tim
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:30:17AM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> MIght you have a well-balanced discussion, not over-too-serious or the
> other side? simply just in the middle, balanced.
A nice sentiment, but indeed for it to be a discussion it should be
two-sided. At the moment you
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:31:53PM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> I just compile without xinerama, and dwm is slighty lighter than jwm.
> If you stick to the minimum with jwm, it is not that heavy at all. This is
> nice.
>
> Why jwm, because after chopping some lines into code, it can
Hi Pat,
> http://incise.org/not-so-tiny-window-managers.html
On that list I see evilwm. Apparently it is stacking, and if I'm not
mistaken it appears to have a similar size to dwm (maybe even smaller).
So why propose JWM instead of EvilWM?
~ Tim
> jwm needs to be simplified and optimized first. Giving a new birth name
> ??WM...
Well, make it happen. Show, don't tell.
~ Tim
Hi Pat,
> Sure that it needs a bit of improvements...
1. I am not sure what problem JWM is trying to solve.
2. I do not think "improvements" will make it suck less.
Certainly there is a place in the world for JWM, just as there is a place
in the world for Openbox, Awesome, even Gnome and KDE. I
> I'm not sure my other "factual error(s?)" was, but I would be happy to
> be enlightened.
Yeah, I wrote in a hurry. After sending it I thought it could have been
worded better. The issues I noticed and was responding to were:
1. Uncertainty around whether .xinitrc would be recognised on session
Dear all,
There seems to be some confusion around xsessions etc, resulting in some
factual errors in one or two recent emails. The following might be useful:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47359/what-is-xsession-for
To summarise, .xsession is used as a custom script when starting X from
Thanks FRIGN, both your emails have given me a bit to think about.
~ Tim
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:36:56AM +0200, hiro wrote:
> the popularity of a language amongst hipsters is quite irrelevant. C
> is still the most used language in programs that actually do anything
> (i.e. not some "app" written in a markup language).
Lol, nice :)
However, arguing to tradition and
> C is definitely not suckless either, especially when it comes
> to UB, but it's probably the language with least suck and
> highest simplicity while giving the most power to the developer.
Not too long ago I expressed support for C as a way to obtain very fast
programs; the context is I work aro
> And why is it netiquette to have line breaks instead
> of line wrapping client-side?
I think someone has just volunteered to submit an RFC on how to send
electronic mail between computers with a multitude of different
architectures and screen sizes on the internet in the 21st century.
Because,
16 matches
Mail list logo
