It really has degenerated into an a pissing contest so I gave up.
Thomas
On Jun 21, 2009, at 11:55 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM, James PIC wrote:
Man bash
man portage
I'm pretty happy that both of those commands fail on all my hand
calculators.
I've been encouraged to take a look at Arch lately by a friend that
likes it a lot. I moved to Gentoo from Slackware 8 a while ago and
that's highlighted even more by the fact that they're at Slackware 12.2
now and pushing 13 (wow, it's been a while).
I'll probably try them both out again now that
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:45:11AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Thomas Gallen wrote:
> > You are correct, we don't give fancy names to automating our
> > installations (at least not that I'm aware of).
>
> If stock Gentoo installa
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Thomas Gallen wrote:
> > Are you referring to manual installation of packages or using the
> > package management system to install packages in alternate locations? If
> > it's the latter:
>
> I develop software for a product
Are you referring to manual installation of packages or using the
package management system to install packages in alternate locations? If
it's the latter:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/187813
(Though I admit I do the former so I can't say I've tried these.)
If it's the forme
> You guys running Gentoo in production environments either have an
> infinite amount of time or else tiny little production environments.
Or they know what they're doing and how they want to do it.
> AFAIK there's no Gentoo equivalent of FAI [1] or kickstart [2], and
> without tools like that a
Let's just delete the thread from our inboxes and move on then. >_>
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Ryan R wrote:
> squabble squabble squabble
>
> On 6/14/09, Thomas Gallen wrote:
> > The issue of incompatibility between the two groups has been brought
> &
Hmm, I noticed the libixp source does have a libixp server example if
you're looking for something to compare to or correct using.
Unfortunately, it's a bit sparse on comments. If Kris wrote it,
perhaps he'd be one to ask about it. It's in the root of the source in
the examples directory.
Thomas
The issue of incompatibility between the two groups has been brought
up in previous threads about this same topic (and I agree).
Unfortunately, if nobody was listening before, then most likely nobody
is listening now.
Thomas
On Jun 14, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1
You make a good point! Then I suppose that means you could filter
out...this thread?
Thomas
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:55:13PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:15:54 +0100
> Alexander Clouter wrote:
>
> > Jeremy Jay wrote:
> > >
> > > As much as I love dwm and suckless pro
Obviously fun should also be outlawed on the internet along with humor
and curiousity.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 6/13/09, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> > I think XKCD were the first people to come up with a solution to this
> > problem[1].
> no he isn't
> th
There's always the archives. Unfortunately, because of the size of
peoples rants these days the off topic discussion is beginning to far
outweigh actual project related chatter.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0400, Jeremy Jay wrote:
> As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I
If you want a light, window manager independent, GTK app to change
GTK themes I believe gtk-chtheme will also do the trick.
Thomas
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:48:47PM +, thay...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2009-06-04 12:37pm, jean bonhomme wrote:
>
>> What was involved in this problem?
>> It should
re to from here?".
Thomas
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:31:42PM +0200, pmarin wrote:
> What was wrong with the pre-dev approach?
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Thomas Gallen wrote:
> >> Seriously people, can't you just listen to it and not correct it? I hate
>
ething too strange and out of interest. I do respect wmii but don't
> > care about it and you also agreed that 'wmii and dwm very obviously
> > cater to different people'. My line was just illustration how different
> > (unmixable?) they are.
> >
> > So eve
which is why I said I didn't necessarily agree with him.
However, your post also appeared rude because of your wmii/dwm comment
and after all of the arguing on the board during the past few days I was
getting tired of people trying to start arguments as your post appeared
to be trying to do.
I don't necessarily agree with Uriel's solution but your tone is no less
rude and point no more correct. The wmii mailing list was a mailing list
for wmii, the dwm mailing list was a mailing list for dwm, NEITHER of
them were the Slashdot RSS feed. Regardless of how "interesting" you
thought the to
> I know that Safari's developer tools are awesome, but I don't know how much
> of that is included in webkit.
>From what I've seen pop up in Arora and Midori, a lot has. Everything
from the javascript profiler and debugging to the live dom tree views,
load graphs and such. However, I don't know
Concise you are not sir.
> Gnome is better than Ktorrent anyway.
Okay, now you're not even trying. :)
Thomas
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:24:39PM +1000, Nathan Hutchison wrote:
> I agree with some of the points you raise Kris, imagine staticly linked KDE
> p.
>
> But on the other hand, a lot
19 matches
Mail list logo
