> Wrong: ...
Sorry for posting again. Does that mean If I have single st window
open it'll allocate 120MiB but won't actually use that?? And also
other applications can't use that space ?? With 10 st window you have
1GiB less, available space for other applications ?
> Wrong: ...
Thanks. If that's the case then topic closed.
> What's the problem here? It's only virtual memory, so the Kernel should
> do exactly that already.
ps aux for st and urxvt
burhan7634 0.1 0.3 181100 20748 ?S19:24 0:00 urxvt
burhan7650 0.1 0.3 181092 20296 ?S19:24 0:00 urxvt
burhan7664 0.1 0.3 18109
urxvt's daemon mode does not give many benefits. It groups terminals
together , so less memory consumption. And It's supposed to be faster,
this part I'm not sure though.
Burhan
On 21 June 2017 at 21:19, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i tried urxvt's daemon mode. it doesn't offer any benefit. i
With HISTSIZE being 2000 memory consumed is around 8MiB
And for 4 it's 120MiB. This is a large number for terminal.
Whereas for urxvt I set saveLines to 65000 and it consumes less around
8MiB. It increases when I have more lines in scrollback .
So my question is if there's a patch that can mak
