.
I'm getting the feeling that I offended you. This was not my intention.
I don't want to discredit quark; it has use cases, which cannot be
satisfied by the tool I presented. statico is better suited for some
use cases that I frequently encounter, but that doesn't mean it's a
replacement for quark.
Best regards,
Richard Ulmer
ng, called statico. I forked it, further
simplified the user interface and added logging. You can find it on
GitHub [3].
It doesn't require root, it's only (optional) parameter is -p for the
port, supports GET and HEAD requests and even respects the Range header.
Best regards,
Richa
Hi Anselm,
I checked the performance of revision
22b5b3cfa6b28f8e0c6c35c04ad9b4cb609b5643 like this:
echo 'foo bar' > index.html
doas quark > /dev/null &
ab -n 1 -c 20 'http://localhost:8083/'
And I got 942 requests/second, so I'd say there is no significant
difference to the current version
